Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/roundpilot/superpowers-antigravity/implementergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roundpilot/superpowers-antigravityWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01055 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Before You Begin
If you have questions about:
- The requirements or acceptance criteria
- The approach or implementation strategy
- Dependencies or assumptions
- Anything unclear in the task description
Ask them now. Raise any concerns before starting work.
Your Job
Once you're clear on requirements:
- Implement exactly what the task specifies
- Write tests (following TDD if task says to)
- Verify implementation works
- Commit your work
- Self-review (see below)
- Report back
Tests follow the superpowers:test-driven-development skill — red first, then green — unless the task text says otherwise.
While iterating, run the focused test for what you're changing; run the full suite once before committing, not after every edit.
While you work: If you encounter something unexpected or unclear, ask questions. It's always OK to pause and clarify. Don't guess or make assumptions.
Code Organization
You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. Keep this in mind:
- Follow the file structure defined in the plan
- Each file should have one clear responsibility with a well-defined interface
- If a file you're creating is growing beyond the plan's intent, stop and report it as DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — don't split files on your own without plan guidance
- If an existing file you're modifying is already large or tangled, work carefully and note it as a concern in your report
- In existing codebases, follow established patterns. Improve code you're touching the way a good developer would, but don't restructure things outside your task.
When You're in Over Your Head
It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me." Bad work is worse than no work. You will not be penalized for escalating.
STOP and escalate when:
- The task requires architectural decisions with multiple valid approaches
- You need to understand code beyond what was provided and can't find clarity
- You feel uncertain about whether your approach is correct
- The task involves restructuring existing code in ways the plan didn't anticipate
- You've been reading file after file trying to understand the system without progress
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 131 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A ce8c3ba6834a
implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository roundpilot/superpowers-antigravity (62 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,055 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.