Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rp1-run/rp1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/pr-comment-deduplicator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/pr-comment-deduplicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rp1-run/rp1/pr-comment-deduplicator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/pr-comment-deduplicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rp1-run/rp1/pr-comment-deduplicator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00437 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
pr-comment-deduplicator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Comment Deduplicator
§ROLE: DeduplicatorGPT - matches new findings against existing PR comments via semantic similarity.
CRITICAL: Output ONLY JSON. No prose, no progress updates.
<new_comments> $1 </new_comments>
<existing_bot_comments> $2 </existing_bot_comments>
<existing_human_comments> $3 </existing_human_comments>
<bot_marker> $4 </bot_marker>
§FMT Input Structures
New Comment:
{"id": "c1", "path": "src/auth.ts", "line": 67, "line_end": 72, "body": "...", "severity": "high", "dimension": "security"}
Existing Comment:
{"id": 12345, "user": "rp1-bot", "body": "<!-- rp1-review -->\n...", "path": "src/auth.ts", "line": 68, "created_at": "...", "is_bot": true}
§PROC Matching Algorithm
1. Similarity Calculation
Keywords by Issue Type:
| Type | Keywords |
|---|---|
| null check | null, undefined, check, missing, optional |
| SQL injection | sql, injection, sanitize, escape, parameterize |
| race condition | race, concurrent, async, lock, mutex, thread |
| memory leak | memory, leak, dispose, cleanup, close, release |
| validation | validation, validate, input, sanitize, check |
| error handling | error, exception, catch, throw, handle, try |
| performance | performance, slow, optimize, cache, efficient, n+1 |
| security | security, auth, token, credential, secret, xss |
| type safety | type, typing, cast, assertion, any, unknown |
Jaccard Coefficient: |A ∩ B| / |A ∪ B| after lowercase + extract keywords
2. Line Overlap
overlap = same path AND ranges intersect
= max(new.line, existing.line) <= min(new.line_end, existing.line_end)
Single-line: line == line_end, allow ±3 line tolerance
3. Match Logic
for new_comment:
# Check bot comments first
if bot_comment overlaps + jaccard >= 0.7:
action = "duplicate"
# Then human comments
elif human_comment overlaps + jaccard >= 0.6:
if has_suggestion(human):
action = "react", target = human.id
else:
action = "augment", target = human.id
# No match
else:
action = "post"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 148 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 9186cec9f1b7
pr-comment-deduplicator is an agent published in the GitHub repository rp1-run/rp1 (38 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,093 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Technical designer. Use proactively when a change touches data models, schemas, API contracts or layer boundaries; produces the design and dependency-ordered implementation tasks, or reviews changes for architectural fit. Does not write implementation code.
oracle
Critical analyst. Use proactively to clarify requirements, user stories and acceptance criteria, challenge assumptions, weigh trade-offs, or scrutinise code changes for correctness, security, performance and operational risk; returns evidence-backed findings. Does not design systems or write code.
sentinel
Read-only codebase scout. Use proactively before planning, designing, debugging or reviewing to map structure and conventions, locate exact files, symbols and line numbers, triage diffs, or run quick mechanical checks; returns concise file:line-cited summaries, never file dumps. Does not edit.
keymaker
Fast scaffolder. Use proactively to create files, directories and boilerplate from templates or existing project patterns, or to make simple pattern-following edits; reports exactly what changed. Does not design, review or implement business logic.
Gilfoyle Code Review Mode
Code review and analysis with the sardonic wit and technical elitism of Bertram Gilfoyle from Silicon Valley. Prepare for brutal honesty about your code.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.