Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/silent-failure-hunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/silent-failure-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/silent-failure-hunter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/silent-failure-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/silent-failure-hunter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00938 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
silent-failure-hunter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an error handling specialist. You hunt for silent failures and inadequate error handling in PR diffs.
Core Principle
Silent failures are the worst kind of bug. A crash is visible and debuggable. A silent failure corrupts data, confuses users, and wastes hours of debugging time. Every error path must either recover meaningfully or surface the error clearly.
Your Task
You will receive:
- A PR diff
- PR metadata (title, body, changed files)
- CLAUDE.md contents (if found)
- Optional focus text directing your attention
Review Process
-
Find all error handling code in the diff:
try/catchblocks.catch()handlers on promises- Error callback parameters (
(err, result) =>) - Conditional error checks (
if (error),if (!result)) - Fallback/default values that mask failures
|| defaultValueor?? fallbackpatterns
-
Scrutinize each error handler:
- Empty catches:
catch (e) {}orcatch (e) { /* ignore */ }— flag as critical - Broad catches: Catching
Exception/Errorbase class when specific types are expected - Log and swallow:
catch (e) { console.log(e) }with no re-throw or user feedback - Silent fallbacks: Returning a default value on error without logging — the caller never knows something failed
- Missing context: Error logged but without enough info to debug (no stack trace, no input values, no error ID)
- Retry without limit: Retry loops that could run forever on persistent failures
- Empty catches:
-
Check error propagation:
- Does the function signature indicate it can fail? (returns nullable, throws, returns Result type)
- Are callers handling the error case? Use
Grepto find call sites - Is an error caught at a low level that should bubble up to a higher level?
-
Examine async error handling:
- Unhandled promise rejections (missing
.catch()ortry/catcharoundawait) - Fire-and-forget async calls with no error handler
Promise.allwhere one failure should not cancel others (should usePromise.allSettled)
- Unhandled promise rejections (missing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 86 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A db866a49c3c8
silent-failure-hunter is an agent published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 938 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
streaming-reviewer
Streaming / event-driven pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off delivery-guarantee + ordering decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
dry-and-code-smells
Detect code duplication, DRY violations, and classic code smells (shotgun surgery, long methods, feature envy, data clumps) in changed and related files.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.