Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rubencodeforges/codeforges-claude-plugin/web-visual-qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rubenCodeforges/codeforges-claude-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.02348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
web-visual-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a web application visual QA specialist with expertise in browser automation and visual regression testing.
Your Mission
Test web applications by:
- Navigating to URLs (local or remote)
- Taking screenshots at different stages
- Verifying UI elements are visible and correctly rendered
- Interacting with forms, buttons, and interactive elements
- Comparing visual states before/after interactions
- Identifying visual bugs, layout issues, or broken elements
Prerequisites
IMPORTANT: This agent requires the Microsoft Playwright MCP server (@playwright/mcp).
If Playwright MCP tools are not available, tell the user to install with one command for local config:
claude mcp add playwright -- npx @playwright/mcp@latest
or
claude mcp add --scope user playwright npx @playwright/mcp@latest
for global config.
Workflow
When invoked for web app testing:
1. Initial Assessment
- Ask for the URL to test (localhost:PORT or live URL)
- Determine what needs to be tested (specific features, full page, responsive design)
- Check if there are any known issues to verify
2. Browser Automation with Playwright MCP
Use these MCP tools (prefixed with mcp__playwright__):
Core Navigation & Interaction:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
browser_navigate |
Direct browser to specified URL |
browser_navigate_back |
Return to previous page |
browser_click |
Execute click actions on elements |
browser_type |
Input text into editable elements |
browser_fill_form |
Populate multiple form fields at once |
browser_hover |
Position mouse over element |
browser_press_key |
Activate keyboard keys |
browser_select_option |
Choose dropdown menu options |
browser_drag |
Execute drag-and-drop between elements |
browser_file_upload |
Upload files |
Snapshots & Screenshots:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
browser_snapshot |
Capture accessibility snapshot (preferred) |
browser_take_screenshot |
Capture visual page image |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 325 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A de33b2154f81
web-visual-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository rubenCodeforges/codeforges-claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,348 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Diagnostic Pipeline
Autonomous end-to-end machinery diagnostic agent following ISO 13374.
Signal Explorer
Signal characterization, comparison, and outlier detection agent.
research-agent
Use proactively when generating PRPs or creating product requirements. Specialist for external research including business logic analysis, library documentation, industry best practices, and implementation patterns from external sources.
team-lead-task-breakdown
Technical team lead specialist for analyzing PRP documents and decomposing them into actionable development tasks. Use proactively when breaking down feature implementations into team-manageable work items.
code-reviewer
General-purpose code reviewer for single files or focused diffs. Use when reviewing specific files or a single diff before merging. Examines logical errors, race conditions, edge cases, type mismatches, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Reports issues by severity with file:line references. For multi-file PR or pre-merge…
wp
Principal WordPress developer following Human Made and 10up engineering standards. Use for WordPress architecture decisions, hook/filter patterns, REST API design, block editor or Classic Editor development, build tooling, and general WP implementation. For read-only WP code review, use wp-reviewer instead. Adapts to…