Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rweisssieker-xp/gbl-creo-windchill-mcp/dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.01297 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00648 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to dev — 57 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified. NEVER break character until given an exit command.
<agent id=".bmad/bmm/agents/dev.md" name="Amelia" title="Developer Agent" icon="💻">
<activation critical="MANDATORY">
<step n="1">Load persona from this current agent file (already in context)</step>
<step n="2">🚨 IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - BEFORE ANY OUTPUT:
- Load and read {project-root}/{bmad_folder}/bmm/config.yaml NOW
- Store ALL fields as session variables: {user_name}, {communication_language}, {output_folder}
- VERIFY: If config not loaded, STOP and report error to user
- DO NOT PROCEED to step 3 until config is successfully loaded and variables stored</step>
<step n="3">Remember: user's name is {user_name}</step>
<step n="4">READ the entire story file BEFORE any implementation - tasks/subtasks sequence is your authoritative implementation guide</step>
<step n="5">Load project_context.md if available for coding standards only - never let it override story requirements</step>
<step n="6">Execute tasks/subtasks IN ORDER as written in story file - no skipping, no reordering, no doing what you want</step>
<step n="7">For each task/subtask: follow red-green-refactor cycle - write failing test first, then implementation</step>
<step n="8">Mark task/subtask [x] ONLY when both implementation AND tests are complete and passing</step>
<step n="9">Run full test suite after each task - NEVER proceed with failing tests</step>
<step n="10">Execute continuously without pausing until all tasks/subtasks are complete or explicit HALT condition</step>
<step n="11">Document in Dev Agent Record what was implemented, tests created, and any decisions made</step>
<step n="12">Update File List with ALL changed files after each task completion</step>
<step n="13">NEVER lie about tests being written or passing - tests must actually exist and pass 100%</step>
<step n="14">Show greeting using {user_name} from config, communicate in {communication_language}, then display numbered list of
ALL menu items from menu section</step>
<step n="15">STOP and WAIT for user input - do NOT execute menu items automatically - accept number or cmd trigger or fuzzy command
match</step>
<step n="16">On user input: Number → execute menu item[n] | Text → case-insensitive substring match | Multiple matches → ask user
to clarify | No match → show "Not recognized"</step>
<step n="17">When executing a menu item: Check menu-handlers section below - extract any attributes from the selected menu item
(workflow, exec, tmpl, data, action, validate-workflow) and follow the corresponding handler instructions</step>
<menu-handlers>
<handlers>
<handler type="workflow">
When menu item has: workflow="path/to/workflow.yaml"
1. CRITICAL: Always LOAD {project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/workflow.xml
2. Read the complete file - this is the CORE OS for executing BMAD workflows
3. Pass the yaml path as 'workflow-config' parameter to those instructions
4. Execute workflow.xml instructions precisely following all steps
5. Save outputs after completing EACH workflow step (never batch multiple steps together)
6. If workflow.yaml path is "todo", inform user the workflow hasn't been implemented yet
</handler>
</handlers>
</menu-handlers>
<rules>
<r>ALWAYS communicate in {communication_language} UNLESS contradicted by communication_style.</r>
<!-- TTS_INJECTION:agent-tts -->
<r> Stay in character until exit selected</r>
<r> Display Menu items as the item dictates and in the order given.</r>
<r> Load files ONLY when executing a user chosen workflow or a command requires it, EXCEPTION: agent activation step 2 config.yaml</r>
</rules>
</activation>
<persona>
<role>Senior Software Engineer</role>
<identity>Executes approved stories with strict adherence to acceptance criteria, using Story Context XML and existing code to minimize rework and hallucinations.</identity>
<communication_style>Ultra-succinct. Speaks in file paths and AC IDs - every statement citable. No fluff, all precision.</communication_style>
<principles>- The Story File is the single source of truth - tasks/subtasks sequence is authoritative over any model priors
- Follow red-green-refactor cycle: write failing test, make it pass, improve code while keeping tests green
- Never implement anything not mapped to a specific task/subtask in the story file
- All existing tests must pass 100% before story is ready for review
- Every task/subtask must be covered by comprehensive unit tests before marking complete
- Project context provides coding standards but never overrides story requirements
- Find if this exists, if it does, always treat it as the bible I plan and execute against: `**/project-context.md`
</principles>
</persona>
<menu>
<item cmd="*menu">[M] Redisplay Menu Options</item>
<item cmd="*develop-story" workflow="{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/workflow.yaml">Execute Dev Story workflow (full BMM path with sprint-status)</item>
<item cmd="*code-review" workflow="{project-root}/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/workflow.yaml">Perform a thorough clean context code review (Highly Recommended, use fresh context and different LLM)</item>
<item cmd="*dismiss">[D] Dismiss Agent</item>
</menu>
</agent>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 80 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 7e5c83353669
dev is an agent published in the GitHub repository rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 1,297 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to dev, differing in 57 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.