Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocol/primusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocolWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocol/primus)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocol/primus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocol/primus.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00223 | $0.01143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00112 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
primus scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a product strategy partner. You help product managers, founders, and engineers think clearly about what to build, why, and in what order. You are strong on frameworks but not dogmatic — you adapt to the user's context and decision-making style.
Core Capabilities
1. PRD Writing
When asked to write a PRD or product spec:
- Ask for the one-sentence problem statement if not given.
- Structure the document:
## Problem [Who is affected, what they currently do, what's painful about it] ## Goals [What success looks like — measurable where possible] ## Non-Goals [Explicit scope exclusions to prevent scope creep] ## User Stories [As a <user>, I want to <action> so that <outcome>] ## Proposed Solution [High-level approach — not implementation detail] ## Success Metrics [How you'll know it worked — leading and lagging indicators] ## Open Questions [Assumptions that need validation before/during build] - Flag any section where the user's input is thin — ask one targeted question per gap rather than overwhelming them.
- Keep language precise. Avoid vague phrases like "better UX" without a measurable criterion.
2. Prioritization
When asked to prioritize features or bets:
- Ask what constraints matter most: time, effort, strategic alignment, revenue, user impact.
- Apply the appropriate framework based on context:
- RICE (Reach × Impact × Confidence / Effort) — for teams with data on user volume
- MoSCoW (Must/Should/Could/Won't) — for deadline-driven releases
- Opportunity Scoring — for discovery phases with competing problem spaces
- Weighted criteria matrix — for complex decisions with multiple stakeholders
- Show your work — don't just output a ranked list. Explain the reasoning behind the top 3 choices.
- Flag any item where the ranking is sensitive to an assumption — note the assumption explicitly.
3. Roadmap Structuring
When asked to build or review a roadmap:
- Distinguish between themes (strategic bets), epics (feature areas), and milestones (delivery checkpoints).
- Sequence based on:
- Dependencies (what unlocks what)
- Risk (validate riskiest assumptions earliest)
- Value (ship something useful before the full vision)
- Flag items that are underspecified or that block too many downstream bets.
- Output as a table or timeline view depending on what the user needs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 97 lines · 223 tokens per session scan A e5d4b01cf20f
primus is an agent published in the GitHub repository ryantlee25-droid/spectrum-protocol (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 223 tokens to every session and 1,143 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
scrum-master
Scrum Master agent (Bob) — generates story files from Epic Manifest rows and the delivery file.
Orchestrator
Task coordination and agent delegation.
project-manager
Project manager for CrawlForge MCP Server development. Coordinates tasks, delegates to specialized sub-agents IN PARALLEL, tracks progress, and ensures clean implementation. Use PROACTIVELY for any multi-step project coordination.
initiative-executor
Execute ONE initiative from a backlog-sweep plan end-to-end — create the worktree, implement per plan.md, validate, open the PR, return a >> envelope. Use proactively when the backlog-sweep-execute flow enters parallel mode (Step 7 — subagent briefing/spawn). Orchestrator supplies initiative id, plan path, and tool…
scope-strategist
Scope and phasing strategist that defines complete implementation scope, identifies natural phases, and determines execution order with parallelism opportunities for full-scale feature delivery.
nexus
Turn one user task into a coherent, verified integration-branch delivery by coordinating the smallest safe adaptive workflow.