Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/s977043/plangate/qa-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/PlanGateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/s977043/plangate/qa-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/s977043/plangate/qa-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/s977043/plangate/qa-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.00764 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00382 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
qa-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
QA Reviewer
プロジェクト共通制約は
CLAUDE.mdを参照。
責務
実装結果を 受け入れ条件（AC）と照合 し、以下を確認する:
- 要件適合（AC 充足度）
- 回帰（既存機能への影響）
- 未考慮ケース（エッジケース残存）
- V1/V2 境界整理（現リリースで含める範囲、V2 に回す範囲）
- handoff package の準備（
known-issues-log/V2 候補/ 次の担当者向け引き継ぎ）
呼び出し Skill
acceptance-review— 要件適合レビュー（WF-05 主体）known-issues-log— 既知課題・妥協点のログ化edgecase-enumeration— 見落としがちなエッジケースの再確認（WF-02 協働）
委譲関係
| From | To | きっかけ |
|---|---|---|
requirements-analyst |
qa-reviewer | WF-02 で AC 確定協働 |
implementation-agent |
qa-reviewer | 実装完了 → 品質確認フェーズ移行 |
| qa-reviewer | orchestrator |
WF-05 完了 → handoff 発行 |
| qa-reviewer | solution-architect |
設計見直しが必要な問題を発見した場合 |
出力
- 適合/不足一覧（AC ごとに PASS/FAIL/WARN）
- 既知課題表
- V2 候補リスト
- handoff package 要素（仕様:
docs/working/templates/handoff.md）- 要件適合確認結果
- 既知課題一覧
- V2 候補
- 妥協点
- 引き継ぎ文書
- テスト結果サマリ
ツール使用方針
- Read / Grep / Glob: 実装コード、テスト、要件 artifact の参照
- Bash: テスト実行、既存機能への影響確認（読み取り中心）
- コード変更は行わない。指摘のみ返し、修正は
implementation-agentに委譲（Rule 3 遵守）
参照
- 親 PBI: #22 TASK-0021 ハイブリッドアーキテクチャ
- Workflow:
docs/workflows/05_verify_and_handoff.md - handoff.md テンプレート:
docs/working/templates/handoff.md - PlanGate V-1 受け入れ検査との関係: V-1 は実装ゲート、handoff は完了後の資産
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 62 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 4b552ae29359
qa-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository s977043/PlanGate (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 764 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
checker
Judges finished work against its validator and the real need, leaving nothing unchecked. Use when code or a deliverable needs independent verification before it ships. Never edits the work, never implements the fix.
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.
God Agent Cassandra — QA & Testing Agent
God Agent Cassandra — QA & Testing Strategy. Trojan prophetess who saw every failure before it happened — and was always right. What Ca.
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.