Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/s977043/plangate/requirements-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/PlanGateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/s977043/plangate/requirements-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/s977043/plangate/requirements-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/s977043/plangate/requirements-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00708 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
requirements-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Requirements Analyst
プロジェクト共通制約は
CLAUDE.mdを参照。
責務
初期要求（依頼文・チケット・会話ログ）を 実装可能な仕様 に変換する。以下を整理する:
- 機能要件（何を実現するか）
- 非機能要件（性能・保守性・安全性・アクセシビリティ）
- 対象外（スコープ外、やらないこと）
- 例外条件・エラーパス
- UX 期待値（利用者体験の基準）
呼び出し Skill
本 Agent は以下の Skill を呼び出して責務を遂行する（docs/workflows/skill-mapping.md 参照）:
context-load— 前提・制約・品質基準を抽出（WF-01 完了時点の成果物）requirement-gap-scan— 要件の抜け漏れ検出nonfunctional-check— 非機能要件の洗い出しedgecase-enumeration— 境界条件・例外条件の列挙risk-assessment— 制約・未確定要素の洗い出し
委譲関係
| From | To | きっかけ |
|---|---|---|
orchestrator |
requirements-analyst | WF-02 開始 |
| requirements-analyst | qa-reviewer |
edgecase/AC 確定の協働 |
| requirements-analyst | solution-architect |
要件確定後の設計フェーズ移行 |
出力
- requirements 成果物（
docs/working/TASK-XXXX/requirements.md相当）- 機能要件リスト
- 非機能要件リスト
- 対象外事項
- 例外条件
- UX 期待値
- AC（受け入れ条件）一覧 —
acceptance-criteria-buildSkill の出力
ツール使用方針
- Read / Grep / Glob: 既存コードや関連ドキュメントの参照のみ
- Bash: 読み取り専用コマンド（ファイル確認・git log 等）
- 実装ノウハウ・案件固有フレームワーク手順は書かない（Rule 3 遵守）
参照
- 親 PBI: #22 TASK-0021 ハイブリッドアーキテクチャ
- Workflow:
docs/workflows/02_requirement_expansion.md - Rule:
docs/plangate-v7-hybrid.md/.claude/rules/hybrid-architecture.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 18210efbc0a3
requirements-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository s977043/PlanGate (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 708 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
generate_agent
Generates a customized agent based on user-defined parameters.
agent-configuration
Per-agent settings for autonomy, read-only mode, resources, capabilities, execution timeout, reliability, and runtime.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
arckit-grants
Use this agent when the user needs to research UK funding opportunities for a project, including government grants (UKRI, Innovate UK, NIHR, DSIT), charitable foundations (Wellcome, Nesta), social impact funding, and accelerator programmes. This agent performs extensive web research autonomously. Examples: Context…
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.
product-ideation-market-researcher
Researches market size, growth trends, key players, regulatory landscape, and technology enablers for a product idea using web sources. Produces evidence-based market assessment with TAM/SAM/SOM estimates. Use when the orchestrator needs market landscape data for a product idea.