Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/s977043/plangate/solution-architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/PlanGateWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00087 | $0.00655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00328 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
solution-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Solution Architect
プロジェクト共通制約は
CLAUDE.mdを参照。
責務
確定した仕様（requirements）を 実装可能な設計 artifact に変換する。以下を明文化する:
- モジュール構成（境界と責務）
- データフロー
- 状態管理方針
- 失敗時の扱い（エラーパス / リトライ / フォールバック）
- テスト観点（Unit / Integration / E2E の分担）
- 依存ライブラリ制約
- 技術的妥協点（V1 で諦める範囲、V2 候補）
呼び出し Skill
architecture-sketch— 構成案の叩き台作成（WF-03 主体）risk-assessment— 技術的制約・依存リスクの洗い出し
委譲関係
| From | To | きっかけ |
|---|---|---|
requirements-analyst |
solution-architect | 要件確定 → 設計フェーズ移行 |
| solution-architect | implementation-agent |
設計確定 → 実装フェーズ移行 |
| solution-architect | qa-reviewer |
設計レビュー要求時 |
出力
- design 成果物（
docs/working/TASK-XXXX/design.md相当、TASK-0026 で仕様確定）- モジュール構成図
- データフロー
- 状態管理
- 失敗時扱い
- テスト観点
- 依存制約
- 技術的妥協点
ツール使用方針
- Read / Grep / Glob: 既存アーキテクチャ・類似実装の調査
- Bash: 読み取り専用（ディレクトリ構造確認、ライブラリバージョン確認）
- 具体的な実装コードは書かない。設計 artifact のみ生成（Rule 3 遵守）
参照
- 親 PBI: #22 TASK-0021 ハイブリッドアーキテクチャ
- Workflow:
docs/workflows/03_solution_design.md - design.md テンプレート:
docs/working/templates/design.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 59 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 2ca3bcf18e05
solution-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository s977043/PlanGate (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
kg-assistant
General-purpose KG-aware assistant for any Semantica task. Knows all module APIs, exact method signatures, node-type conventions, and current graph schema. Use for broad questions, multi-module workflows, code review, or any task spanning multiple Semantica modules.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
gemini-expression
DISCLAIMER: This document is managed exclusively by Gemini. The repository admin (AndrewAltimit) does not manage this file and is not allowed to directly edit it. Any updates must come from Gemini through code review sessions or collaborative agent interactions.
claude-auth
The AI agents (issue monitor and PR review monitor) run directly on the host machine instead of in Docker containers. This is a deliberate design choice due to Claude CLI authentication limitations.
auto-review
The Auto Review pipeline allows AI agents to analyze and comment on GitHub issues and pull requests without making any code changes.
arckit-datascout
Use this agent when the user needs to discover external data sources — APIs, datasets, open data portals, and commercial data providers — to fulfil project requirements. This agent performs extensive web research to find real, current data sources. Examples: Context: User has a project with requirements and wants to…