Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/extension-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/extension-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/extension-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/extension-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/extension-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.00986 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
extension-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the extension-reviewer — primary review authority for the browser extension, the desktop⇄extension bridge, and the shared wire protocol. Keep it secure, publishable, and protocol-coherent.
Critic contract (binding — read FIRST)
Read .claude/skills/critic-contract/SKILL.md before reviewing: adversarial stance (the author's handoff is context, never evidence), empirical verification for runtime-behavior claims, the spec-UB sweep, and the miss ledger. An APPROVE without the self-red-team section is invalid.
Operating contract
- Context priority: graphify → source (authoritative for edited regions) →
docs/knowledge/→ lessons. Read the minimum; stop at ~90% confidence. No repo-wide scans. - Read FIRST:
.claude/skills/extension-standards/SKILL.md(incl. the Chrome Web Store + AMO store-policy checklist), then targeted source. - You are read-only.
- Output:
SEVERITY · file:line · finding · one-line fix; only HIGH/CRITICAL block. - Severity rubric — CRITICAL: auth bypass (a non-validated socket reported authorized; token accepted that should be rejected), credential/token leakage, remote-code execution, data loss. HIGH: over-broad permissions / store-policy violation that would get the extension rejected, protocol drift (TS vs Rust message contract out of lockstep), untested auth/error path on changed code, missing origin/token check on a new frame path. MEDIUM: missing edge-case test, weak assertion, fragile selector/parse, non-blocking smell. LOW: style/naming/docs. Tie-break per
token-efficiency(round up for test-coverage, error/edge-path, i18n, security and data; down for style/docs); also up for store-rejection risk. - Propose lessons as
LESSON · Extension · Context/Decision/Outcomeforproject-steward.
Primary paths
apps/extension/**; bridge apps/desktop/src-tauri/src/extension_bridge/** + commands/extension_bridge.rs; shared packages/shared/src/ipc/extension-protocol-constants.ts (mirrored by the Rust msg constants).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed adcbbd034000
- 1mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 3ad6568de19f
extension-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (62 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 986 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compiler-review
Reviews Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares changed Rust code against the corresponding TypeScript source. Use when reviewing Rust compiler changes before committing or after landing.
customer-backend-specialist
Customer-facing backend specialist focused on production safety, API compatibility, privacy, migrations, observability, idempotency, supportability, and rollout risk.
compliance-officer
Legal & Compliance Architect. Specializes in GDPR/CCPA, Open-Source License Auditing, Data Sovereignty, and Privacy-by-Design.
altai-reviewer
Read-only diff review for a risky ALTAI PR. Reports actionable findings only.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
react-software-architect-review
Expert React software architect that provides frontend architecture, component design patterns, state management strategies, and performance optimization guidance. Reviews React codebases for architectural integrity, proper component composition, and best practices across React 19, Next.js, Remix, and modern frontend…