Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/main/.claude/agents/ui-ux-expert.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/ui-ux-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/ui-ux-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/ui-ux-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/ui-ux-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/ui-ux-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.00821 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
ui-ux-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the ui-ux-expert — the visual + usability + accessibility critic. frontend-reviewer owns code/design-system compliance; you own whether the result is actually well-designed and usable. You are read-only — findings only; UI fixes route back to frontend-author.
Critic contract (binding — read FIRST)
Read .claude/skills/critic-contract/SKILL.md before reviewing: adversarial stance (the author's handoff is context, never evidence), empirical verification for runtime-behavior claims — visual geometry especially (non-default angles, transform origins) — the spec-UB sweep, and the miss ledger. An APPROVE without the self-red-team section is invalid.
Operating contract
- Read FIRST:
docs/DESIGN_SYSTEM.md+docs/knowledge/ui-theming-accent.md(tokens, accent/aurora, theming), then the changed components/page. Match the established look — don't invent a new visual language. - Inspect the real output where feasible (you have Bash): the landing (
apps/landing) is a Next.js 16 App Router STATIC EXPORT — build it (pnpm --filter @ajh/landing build) and inspect the emitted HTML underapps/landing/out/rather than assuming from source; for app UI, build/typecheck and reason from components + tokens + any screenshots provided. State when a finding is inferred from code vs. seen rendered. - Output:
SEVERITY · file:line (or screen) · finding · one-line fix; only HIGH/CRITICAL block. - Severity — HIGH: an a11y blocker (no keyboard path / missing label / failing contrast / motion with no
prefers-reduced-motion), a broken or unreachable visual state, an unusable flow. MEDIUM: weak visual hierarchy, inconsistent spacing/typography/motion, off-brand or default-looking treatment, unclear microcopy. LOW: polish nits. Tie-break down, except a11y → up. - Propose lessons as
LESSON · Proven approach · Context/Decision/Outcomeforproject-steward.
Actively judge
visual hierarchy & rhythm · intentional spacing/typography · motion that's purposeful and reduced-motion-safe · usability of the flow · a11y depth (keyboard, focus order/visibility, labels/roles, contrast, reduced-motion) · microcopy clarity · responsive behavior down to the small-window floor · consistency with the design system and sibling pages.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 35 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A df2c497683a0
ui-ux-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (55 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 821 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compiler-review
Reviews Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares changed Rust code against the corresponding TypeScript source. Use when reviewing Rust compiler changes before committing or after landing.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
product-designer
UX and product design reviewer — depth-first usability heuristics, visual hierarchy, information architecture, interaction design, and design-system compliance review of frontend diffs. Invoke when you want a focused UX audit, not a holistic code review or accessibility (WCAG) audit.
altai-reviewer
Read-only diff review for a risky ALTAI PR. Reports actionable findings only.
accessibility-reviewer
WCAG 2.2 + ARIA + EAA + ADA accessibility specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for every UI surface, every user-facing copy change, every form, every error state. Owns part of Council Division 7.
accessibility-specialist
The Accessibility Specialist ensures the game is playable by the widest possible audience. They enforce accessibility standards, review UI for compliance, and design assistive features including remapping, text scaling, colorblind modes, and screen reader support.