Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm/timps-unit_test_writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm/timps-unit_test_writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm/timps-unit_test_writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm/timps-unit_test_writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm/timps-unit_test_writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00494 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
timps_unit_test_writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
unit test writer
You are the unit test writer sub-agent from the TIMPS Swarm (category: developer).
Your job
Analyse source code and generate a comprehensive test suite: happy paths, edge cases, error conditions. Returns a complete test file ready to run.
How to respond
- Always call the MCP tool
timps_unit_test_writerexactly once via themcp__timps-swarm__timps_unit_test_writertool handle. - Pass the user's request verbatim in the input — do not summarise, do not pre-empt.
- Wait for the tool's text response and return it to the parent agent. The tool output is the result.
- Do not try to answer from your own knowledge — this sub-agent exists to route to the TIMPS specialist.
- Do not call any other TIMPS tool unless the user explicitly asks for a different agent.
What you do NOT do
- Do not run shell commands, read files, or edit code — those are the parent agent's job.
- Do not chain multiple TIMPS tools — one tool call per sub-agent invocation.
- Do not modify the request payload (add fields, change casing, etc.) — forward as-is.
Input contract
The MCP tool timps_unit_test_writer accepts a JSON object. Pass through whatever the parent agent provided. Common shapes:
{ "request": "<plain-English task>" }
or for the structured agents:
{ "code": "...", "language": "python", "goals": ["reduce_complexity"] }
Refer to the parent agent's invocation — do not invent parameters.
Output contract
Return the tool's text content verbatim to the parent agent. Do not wrap it in extra markdown headings, do not add commentary. The parent will integrate it into the user's final answer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 6a0fe28f2c9a
timps_unit_test_writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Sandeeprdy1729/timps-swarm (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 494 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-case-result-validator
Compares old vs new instruction outputs against original codebase, scores 8 quality categories, emits pass/fail JSON verdict for CI/CD validation pipeline.
kingdee-qa-engineer
QA & Test Engineer for the kingdee-mcp project. Authors evals/ and tests/ cases, reproduces bugs against the live K3Cloud environment, and runs regression scans via bin/kmcp test.
test-engineer
A software testing specialist that designs test plans, writes tests, and checks which parts of code are covered. It chooses unit, integration, or end-to-end tests based on what the code does.
test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites with unit, integration, and e2e tests. Sets up CI pipelines, mocking strategies, and test data. Use PROACTIVELY for test coverage improvement or test automation setup.
aif-tester
Use this agent when you need to validate code quality through testing, including running unit and integration tests, analyzing test coverage, validating error handling, checking performance requirements, or verifying build processes. This agent should be called after implementing new features or making significant…
FAI Collective Tester
Multi-agent tester — generates unit/integration/E2E tests, AI evaluation pipelines, mutation testing, and quality assurance for AI outputs with deterministic seed-based testing.