Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sangrokjung/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sangrokjung/claude-forge/observer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sangrokjung/claude-forge/observer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sangrokjung/claude-forge/observer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sangrokjung/claude-forge/observer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sangrokjung/claude-forge/observer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01094 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00438 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
observer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Observer Agent
A background agent that analyzes observations from Claude Code sessions to detect patterns and create instincts.
When to Run
- After significant session activity (20+ tool calls)
- When user runs
/analyze-patterns - On a scheduled interval (configurable, default 5 minutes)
- When triggered by observation hook (SIGUSR1)
Input
Reads observations from ~/.claude/homunculus/observations.jsonl:
{"timestamp":"2025-01-22T10:30:00Z","event":"tool_start","session":"abc123","tool":"Edit","input":"..."}
{"timestamp":"2025-01-22T10:30:01Z","event":"tool_complete","session":"abc123","tool":"Edit","output":"..."}
{"timestamp":"2025-01-22T10:30:05Z","event":"tool_start","session":"abc123","tool":"Bash","input":"npm test"}
{"timestamp":"2025-01-22T10:30:10Z","event":"tool_complete","session":"abc123","tool":"Bash","output":"All tests pass"}
Pattern Detection
Look for these patterns in observations:
1. User Corrections
When a user's follow-up message corrects Claude's previous action:
- "No, use X instead of Y"
- "Actually, I meant..."
- Immediate undo/redo patterns
→ Create instinct: "When doing X, prefer Y"
2. Error Resolutions
When an error is followed by a fix:
- Tool output contains error
- Next few tool calls fix it
- Same error type resolved similarly multiple times
→ Create instinct: "When encountering error X, try Y"
3. Repeated Workflows
When the same sequence of tools is used multiple times:
- Same tool sequence with similar inputs
- File patterns that change together
- Time-clustered operations
→ Create workflow instinct: "When doing X, follow steps Y, Z, W"
4. Tool Preferences
When certain tools are consistently preferred:
- Always uses Grep before Edit
- Prefers Read over Bash cat
- Uses specific Bash commands for certain tasks
→ Create instinct: "When needing X, use tool Y"
Output
Creates/updates instincts in ~/.claude/homunculus/instincts/personal/:
---
id: prefer-grep-before-edit
trigger: "when searching for code to modify"
confidence: 0.65
domain: "workflow"
source: "session-observation"
---
# Prefer Grep Before Edit
## Action
Always use Grep to find the exact location before using Edit.
## Evidence
- Observed 8 times in session abc123
- Pattern: Grep → Read → Edit sequence
- Last observed: 2025-01-22
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6eb1e64adabe
observer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sangrokjung/claude-forge (863 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,094 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
stock-peer-comparison-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock independent peer benchmarking — 12-item ratio panel (growth, profitability, capital intensity, leverage, valuation) computed identically for target and 2-4 peers, surfacing rank-by-item plus best-in-panel and worst-in-panel summary. Provides quantitative cross-validation for the moat and…
stock-industry-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock industry-position and competitive-moat review — Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics, moat classification (7 named types), substitute and new-entrant threats, pricing-power evidence (cross-cycle margin stability)…
stock-management-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock management-quality review — 5-year capital allocation history, buyback timing quality, M&A track record, guidance-vs-actuals scorecard, comp structure alignment, insider ownership and trading activity, earnings-call communication style, and strategic-thesis stability. Use when analyzing the…
stock-balance-sheet-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock balance-sheet health review — leverage (Net Debt/EBITDA), liquidity (current ratio, cash runway), goodwill concentration and impairment history, working capital trends (DSO, inventory days), off-balance-sheet items (commitments, contingencies), and pension underfunding. Use when assessing…
stock-business-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock business-model and revenue-structure review — product/service mix, customer concentration, geographic exposure, industry position, revenue-growth decomposition, and information-tier discipline. Use when analyzing the business-understanding layer of an equity workup. Dispatched by…
stock-earnings-quality-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock earnings-quality review — cash flow vs net income drift, FCF trajectory, capex character, revenue quality (channel stuffing, deferred-revenue trend), gross margin level and trend, operating leverage, three-cost hygiene, and SaaS-specific metrics (NRR, GRR, CAC payback, Magic Number). Use when…