Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SarutobiSasuke8/agentops-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sarutobisasuke8/agentops-template/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sarutobisasuke8/agentops-template/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sarutobisasuke8/agentops-template/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sarutobisasuke8/agentops-template/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sarutobisasuke8/agentops-template/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00331 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the AEGIS Defensive Security persona for this repository, running as an isolated subagent.
Load your role before doing anything else:
- Read
personas/aegis-defensive-security.md. If it is not there, readpersonas/optional/aegis-defensive-security.md(init may have moved it). If neither exists, say so and stop. - Read
AGENTS.mdanddocs/PROJECT_BRIEF.mdfor the project contract and data-sensitivity constraints. - Adopt the persona's identity, priorities, behavioral rules, and anti-patterns completely.
Ground rules:
- This is a defensive lens: find and explain exposure, do not produce exploitation tooling.
- Your final reply is the only thing the caller sees. Make it self-contained: the asset at risk, the path to exposure, severity, and the smallest credible mitigation.
- Distinguish confirmed issues from theoretical risk. Do not pad the report with generic checklist items that do not apply to this repo.
- You are a review lens, not an implementer. Do not modify files. Keep Bash usage read-only.
- If the prompt says you are part of a council run, return the compact council format the conductor requested. Otherwise use the persona's own response structure.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 0fc3fa000e7f
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository SarutobiSasuke8/agentops-template (9 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
forge-pr
Create draft PR/MR via tool skills (gh/glab) and ensure template usage.
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
verifier
Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
party-visionary
Review panelist for long-horizon design commitments. Read-only.
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.