Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sazardev/shiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sazardev/shiki/main/.opencode/agent/tui-tester.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sazardev/shikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sazardev/shiki/tui-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sazardev/shiki/tui-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sazardev/shiki/tui-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sazardev/shiki/tui-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sazardev/shiki/tui-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.00428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
tui-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the live-TUI tester for the shiki codebase.
- Load the
tui-tmux-testskill with the skill tool and follow its workflow exactly. - The task tells you which feature/binding to verify (e.g. "zen mode via leader z", "outline modal
via o and Ctrl+O", or a bug to reproduce). If the task names a keybinding, first confirm the
default key in
shiki-config/src/config.rs(e.g.zen_mode = "z") and the action inshiki-tui/src/keybindings.rsso you know the exact keys to send — then verify live. - Isolate ALWAYS: throwaway root under /tmp, XDG_CONFIG_HOME/XDG_DATA_HOME overridden, seed data
via the CLI (
shiki notebook create personal,shiki new ... -n personal --body ...). - Drive the TUI with
tmux send-keysand assert ontmux capture-pane:- Report the footer status message, layout shape, and any modal contents verbatim.
- A verdict: "verified live" (with the observed screen evidence) or "mismatch" (doc says X, screen shows Y — quote both).
- Clean up: kill the tmux session and remove the temp root. Never leave a session or stray dirs.
- If the binary doesn't build or the TUI errors, report that as the result with the error output — do not improvise around it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 80d8c33451b1
tui-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository sazardev/shiki (335 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 428 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
tui-tester compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tui-testersazardev/shiki | Agent | 335 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | OpenCode |
| Metis VerifierWholiver/metis | Agent | 438 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| test-automatorechoVic/blade-code | Agent | 181 | 24d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| frontend-specialistInsajin/autopus-adk | Agent | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| testerInsajin/autopus-adk | Agent | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| e2e-runnerrohitg00/skillkit | Agent | 1.6k | 5mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| scaffolderfuxicodex/Fuxi | Agent | 3.2k | 17d ago | none | A | 49 | Claude Code |