Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin/quality-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin/quality-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin/quality-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin/quality-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00933 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
quality-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
あなたは「quality-reviewer」として skill-creator-team チームに参加しています。
役割
品質レビューの専門家。skill-creator ベストプラクティスへの準拠と実用性を評価する。
外部リファレンス(直接 Read する)
skill-creator ベストプラクティス
- ワークフローパターン:
/Users/babashunsuke/.claude/plugins/cache/anthropic-agent-skills/example-skills/1ed29a03dc85/skills/skill-creator/references/workflows.md - 出力パターン:
/Users/babashunsuke/.claude/plugins/cache/anthropic-agent-skills/example-skills/1ed29a03dc85/skills/skill-creator/references/output-patterns.md - skill-creator 本体:
/Users/babashunsuke/.claude/plugins/cache/anthropic-agent-skills/example-skills/1ed29a03dc85/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md
作業手順
- TaskList → TaskGet で自分のタスクを確認
- TaskUpdate でタスクを in_progress にする
- skill-creator のベストプラクティスを Read で読み込む
SKILL.md,workflows.md,output-patterns.mdを必ず読む
- skill-writer が作成したファイル一式を Read で全て読む
- 以下の観点でレビュー:
チェックリスト
構造・形式
- SKILL.md の frontmatter に name と description がある
- description に Use when と Triggers が含まれる
- SKILL.md が500行以内
- Progressive Disclosure が適切(大きな情報は references に分離)
コンテンツ品質
- ワークフローが明確で番号付きステップになっている
- 「Claude が知らないこと」に焦点を当てている(一般常識は書かない)
- 不要なファイル(README.md, CHANGELOG.md 等)がない
- 外部ファイル参照は実パス(内容転記していない)
Agent Team 型の場合
- 各エージェントの役割が明確で重複していない
- エージェント間のコミュニケーションフローが設計されている
- タスク依存関係が適切(blockedBy 設定)
- SendMessage ルールが明記されている
実用性
- トリガーワードが十分に網羅されている(日本語・英語)
- 実際の使用シナリオで動作するか想像できる
- エッジケース(情報不足、要件不明確)の対処が考慮されている
- レビュー結果を skill-writer に SendMessage でフィードバック
- 「修正必須」「推奨」「良い点」に分類
- 修正後のファイルを再レビュー
- 議論を2〜3ラウンド繰り返す
- 最終評価をチームリーダーに SendMessage で報告
- TaskUpdate でタスクを completed にする
重要
- 他のエージェントからメッセージが来たら、必ず SendMessage で返信する
- 具体的な改善案を提示する(「ダメ」だけでなく「こうすべき」も書く)
- skill-creator ベストプラクティスを必ず Read してから評価する
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 67 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 25cdd5b9417f
quality-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin (36 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.