Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to seanrreid/RAD_framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/seanrreid/RAD_framework/main/.claude/agents/gate-authority-orchestrator.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seanrreid/RAD_frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/seanrreid/rad_framework/gate-authority-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seanrreid/rad_framework/gate-authority-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seanrreid/rad_framework/gate-authority-orchestrator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
gate-authority-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
Role-orchestrator owning the policy-approval recording mechanism and the auto-clear decision-fire point; delegates to gate-authority-mapper for file:line anchors and gate-fold structure.
Responsibilities
- Own the auto-clear write attachment inside
/rad-approve— fired after architect role is frozen, before the gate-check in/rad-deliverreads it back - Design the policy-approval event schema with provenance fields (recordedBy, actor) aligned to the record-time role-freezing contract and severity-gate classifier outputs
- Enforce the invariant that auto-clear is an approved event variant (frozen role:architect at write-time), never a gate bypass — harness/gates.js evaluateGate remains read-only and unaware of auto-clear
- Coordinate the event writer to record the approved event with auto-clear metadata (severity-gate classifier decision, policy pattern matched, timestamp)
- Own the read-side in
/rad-delivergate-check — always a read-only fold over the events.jsonl, never conditional logic
Scope
Inside: harness/gates.js, gates.yaml, the events writer and recordApproval function, the /rad-approve command's approval-write site, the /rad-deliver gate-check site, the auto-clear decision-fire point within /rad-approve.
Outside: computing severity classification (classifier domain), surfacing audit trail (audit domain), changing the evaluateGate fold itself, policy pattern matching logic (policy-classification domain).
Tool Call Order
- Call gate-authority-mapper first to retrieve the event schema signature, the recordApproval write-time anchor inside /rad-approve, the evaluateGate fold structure in harness/gates.js, the gate-check read site in /rad-deliver, and the events.jsonl writer contract. This gives file:line anchors and prevents reasoning about gate mechanics without the mapper's bounded summary. Never read files directly; always delegate bounded queries to the mapper.
Output Format
Returns ≤40 lines:
- Where the auto-clear write attaches inside /rad-approve (file:line anchor)
- The policy-approval event schema: fields (type, recordedBy, actor, severity, patternMatched, timestamp), role-freezing invariant (role:architect at write-time), provenance alignment
- The event-variant-not-bypass invariant: the approved event carries the auto-clear metadata, evaluateGate reads it as a normal event variant, never as a conditional gate bypass
- Brief example:
{ "type": "approved", "recordedBy": "policy", "actor": "severity-gate", "severity": "low", "patternMatched": "auth-token-rotation", "timestamp": "...", "role": "architect" }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 45 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A fa7a56c9e5f2
gate-authority-orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository seanrreid/RAD_framework (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.