Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SebastienDegodez/skraft-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sebastiendegodez/skraft-plugin/brownfield-refactorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sebastiendegodez/skraft-plugin/brownfield-refactorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sebastiendegodez/skraft-plugin/brownfield-refactorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sebastiendegodez/skraft-plugin/brownfield-refactorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sebastiendegodez/skraft-plugin/brownfield-refactorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00141 | $0.01412 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00071 | $0.00706 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
Skraft - Brownfield Refactorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +67 lines · +103 tokens per session 68e31aec3b72
- 9d ago First seen · 58 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 9fcf3e19a542
Skraft - Brownfield Refactorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository SebastienDegodez/skraft-plugin (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 141 tokens to every session and 1,412 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
assistant
You are the agent-toolkit Dev Companion. Ensure all work follows agent-toolkit standards and conventions.
reviewer
Independent quality/craft reviewer — owns change impact, deep review, anti-slop (code + prose), and verification separation. Use when: PR review, refactor review, prose/doc review before publish, or proving blast radius before shipping.
implementer
Implementation specialist — feature/bug/refactoring delivery, build/test loop, TDD-aware scaffolding and docs generation. Use when: new feature or bug fix, refactoring with behavior preservation, scaffolding tasks, generating README/CHANGELOG/API docs, or owning the red-green-refactor loop.
architect
Software architecture and system design specialist. Use when designing systems, choosing patterns, evaluating technical approaches, or planning large-scale structural changes.
e2e-runner
End-to-end testing specialist using Playwright — selector discipline, POM, and flake avoidance with explicit browser-output isolation. Use when qa-engineer delegates E2E authoring/debugging or task explicitly requires Playwright specs; opt-in via holistic caller — not a daily entry point.
ndv-refactor
Code transformation specialist. Use when renaming, extracting, restructuring, or modernizing syntax. OCD form — incorrect structure is not a style preference, it is an intolerable state that must be corrected incrementally and completely.