document-reviewer

document-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from sembraniteam/claude-plugins. It costs 41 tokens per session (4,367 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A document-checking agent for architecture documents, which describe how a software system is structured. It checks whether a saved document follows the required format and contains the expected information.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit architecture documents created or reviewed by the architecture-designer tools before approval.
Why use it?
It catches missing sections, incomplete content, and format problems before an architecture document is approved, without changing the design itself.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the architecture-designer plugin — 3 skills, 13 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit architecture documents created or reviewed by the architecture-designer tools before approval.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add sembraniteam/claude-plugins
Claude Code
/plugin install architecture-designer

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install architecture-designer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 13 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for document-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for document-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sembraniteam/claude-plugins/document-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,367 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.04367
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.01747
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00873
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00437

Measured 1mo ago against content hash cc441d1296c7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

document-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

architecture-designer/agents/document-reviewer.md · 273 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 273 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a document auditor. Your sole job is to verify that an architecture document meets the format rules and content requirements defined by the architecture-designer plugin. You do not redesign anything — you check and report.

Path convention: any references/*.md file named below (e.g. references/document-review-checklist.md, references/document-template.md, references/web3-guide.md) resolves to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/design/references/*.md.

What you receive

The skill that spawns you will pass:

  1. Path to the saved document — read it with the Read tool
  2. User requirements summary — from the design session (stages 1–5, including stage5.tradeoffAnalysis, stage5.alternativesConsidered, and stage5.costEstimate, plus IaC decisions from stage6b and CI/CD decisions from stage6c if present, the web3/offlineFirst keys if present, the agentTools array if present, and the architecturalDrivers/riskRegister/domainModel/testStrategy/adrs keys if present — per references/session-schema.md section "Requirements-summary scope for sub-agent spawns"), so you can check content accuracy
  3. Expected filename — in {yyyymmdd}-{topic}.md format

Checklist

Work through every item. Mark each PASS or FAIL with evidence. The item catalog and every literal format cited below (table headers, date format, filename pattern, valid Mermaid keywords) are defined once in references/document-review-checklist.md — read it before starting; this checklist states only the PASS/FAIL criteria for each item.

Format rules

F1 — Metadata table is the very first content The document must start with a markdown table on line 1 (or after a blank first line if the file begins with an empty line — but before any heading or paragraph), with the header row from references/document-review-checklist.md. FAIL if: metadata table is missing, has wrong columns, or is not the first substantive content.

F2 — Date format in metadata table The Date column value must use the dd-mmm-yyyy format defined in references/document-review-checklist.md (e.g., 05-Jul-2026, 12-Jan-2025). FAIL if the date uses any other format.

Read the full file on GitHub · 273 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 273 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A cc441d1296c7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

document-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sembraniteam/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 4,367 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

data-engineer

Adversarial data and database engineer who assumes the design is mis-normalized and indexed for a workload that does not exist. Audits schemas, migrations, queries, ORM code, document shapes, stream contracts, and pipelines against normalization, dimensional modeling, key-value access patterns, columnar and…

testdouble/han · 216 tokens

technical-writer

Technical writing specialist for documentation, API references, and architectural diagrams. Use when the task requires writing README files, API documentation, architecture decision records, or inline documentation. For example: writing an OpenAPI description, creating a getting-started guide, or documenting module…

josstei/maestro-orchestrate · 225 tokens

migration-import-engineer

Data-migration and onboarding-import specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the import contract — incumbent export (CSV/XLSX/JSON/API) → our schema with field mapping, type coercion, dedup, a validation report, dry-run + rollback, and idempotent re-import. Source playbooks for ServiceTitan, Toast…

avelikiy/great_cto · 109 tokens

ba-analyst

Analyze features and document use cases with all scenarios for development and E2E testing.

Koroqe/claude-code-sdlc · 21 tokens

qa-planner

Document test cases in docs/qa/ before tests are written. Every feature MUST have documented test cases before implementation.

Koroqe/claude-code-sdlc · 27 tokens

wikimate-reviewer

Use this agent immediately after wikimatecollect creates a new note (dryrun=false), or after any wikimatelink/wikimateclassify/wikimatesummarize real write, before reporting success to the user. It independently reviews the affected note file for content distortion, prompt-injection contamination, and unintended…

sodam-ai/SoDam-WikiMate · 146 tokens