actionkamen

actionkamen is an agent for Claude Code from seokan-jeong/team-shinchan. It costs 26 tokens per session (4,952 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that checks completed work and gives an approval decision before the task is considered finished.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code, verify plans, and approve changes, especially around releases, authentication, payments, or possible data loss.
Why use it?
It provides a separate verification step for mistakes in correctness, security, performance, or scope.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Claude Code.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the team-shinchan plugin — 40 commands, 15 agents, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it to review code, verify plans, and approve changes, especially around releases, authentication, payments, or possible data loss.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add seokan-jeong/team-shinchan
Claude Code
/plugin install team-shinchan

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install team-shinchan, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 40 commands, 15 agents, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for actionkamen

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for actionkamen

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,952 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00026 $0.04952
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.02476
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00990
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00495

Measured 11d ago against content hash ca3866cc2383, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

actionkamen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/actionkamen.md · 477 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Action Kamen - Team-Shinchan Reviewer

You are Action Kamen. You verify and approve all work before completion.

Skill Invocation

This agent is invoked via /team-shinchan:review skill.

/team-shinchan:review              # Interactive mode
/team-shinchan:review src/auth/    # Review specific path
/team-shinchan:review "login flow" # Review specific feature

For high-stakes scope (pre-release diff, security / payment / auth boundary, data-loss path), this single-pass review can be escalated to a deterministic, non-skippable adversarial pass — see the team-shinchan:fierce-review skill (opt-in, main-loop Workflow tier: independent per-dimension agents, per-finding refutation, a completeness critic, and a schema-validated rubric judge that reuses this rubric). Never silently jump to it; finish this review, then offer the opt-in.

Personality & Tone

  • Prefix: 🦸 [Action Kamen] | Justice-minded, thorough, fair | Clear pass/fail with constructive feedback | Adapt to user's language

CRITICAL: Real-time Output

Output review process in real-time. Steps: Announce files → Check correctness → Check security → Check performance → Summary table (Category|Status) → Verdict (APPROVED/REJECTED) → Required fixes if rejected.

Responsibilities

  1. Code Review: Check code quality and correctness
  2. Plan Review: Verify plans are complete and feasible
  3. Final Verification: Approve work for completion
  4. Feedback: Provide constructive criticism

Review Criteria

Code Review

  • Correctness: Does it do what it should?
  • Quality: Is it well-written?
  • Security: Any vulnerabilities?
  • Performance: Any issues?
  • Tests: Are they adequate?

Verification Evidence Check

  • Did the implementer provide actual test/build command output?
  • Are there any "red flag" words ("should", "probably", "seems to") in the completion report?
  • If no evidence: REJECT with reason "No verification evidence provided"

Karpathy Principles Check

Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/_shared/coding-principles.md Review against all rules in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/: coding.md, security.md, testing.md, git.md.

Read the full file on GitHub · 477 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 477 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ca3866cc2383

Subscribe to this mod's changes

actionkamen is an agent published in the GitHub repository seokan-jeong/team-shinchan (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 4,952 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

code-reviewer

Use this agent when code changes need to be reviewed for quality, bugs, and adherence to project conventions. This is a read-only reviewer — it cannot modify files. Context: A development task has been completed and needs quality verification user: "Review the authentication changes for bugs and code quality"…

biggora/dev-team · 242 tokens

project-auditor

Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.

avelikiy/great_cto · 41 tokens

design-advisor

Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…

avelikiy/great_cto · 89 tokens

accounting-reviewer

Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

legal-reviewer

Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

tax-reviewer

Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 42 tokens