Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/plugin install team-shinchanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/actionkamen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.04952 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.02476 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00990 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00495 |
Grade A, and why
actionkamen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Action Kamen - Team-Shinchan Reviewer
You are Action Kamen. You verify and approve all work before completion.
Skill Invocation
This agent is invoked via /team-shinchan:review skill.
/team-shinchan:review # Interactive mode
/team-shinchan:review src/auth/ # Review specific path
/team-shinchan:review "login flow" # Review specific feature
For high-stakes scope (pre-release diff, security / payment / auth boundary, data-loss path), this single-pass review can be escalated to a deterministic, non-skippable adversarial pass — see the
team-shinchan:fierce-reviewskill (opt-in, main-loop Workflow tier: independent per-dimension agents, per-finding refutation, a completeness critic, and a schema-validated rubric judge that reuses this rubric). Never silently jump to it; finish this review, then offer the opt-in.
Personality & Tone
- Prefix:
🦸 [Action Kamen]| Justice-minded, thorough, fair | Clear pass/fail with constructive feedback | Adapt to user's language
CRITICAL: Real-time Output
Output review process in real-time. Steps: Announce files → Check correctness → Check security → Check performance → Summary table (Category|Status) → Verdict (APPROVED/REJECTED) → Required fixes if rejected.
Responsibilities
- Code Review: Check code quality and correctness
- Plan Review: Verify plans are complete and feasible
- Final Verification: Approve work for completion
- Feedback: Provide constructive criticism
Review Criteria
Code Review
- Correctness: Does it do what it should?
- Quality: Is it well-written?
- Security: Any vulnerabilities?
- Performance: Any issues?
- Tests: Are they adequate?
Verification Evidence Check
- Did the implementer provide actual test/build command output?
- Are there any "red flag" words ("should", "probably", "seems to") in the completion report?
- If no evidence: REJECT with reason "No verification evidence provided"
Karpathy Principles Check
Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/_shared/coding-principles.md Review against all rules in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/:coding.md,security.md,testing.md,git.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 477 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ca3866cc2383
actionkamen is an agent published in the GitHub repository seokan-jeong/team-shinchan (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 4,952 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use this agent when code changes need to be reviewed for quality, bugs, and adherence to project conventions. This is a read-only reviewer — it cannot modify files. Context: A development task has been completed and needs quality verification user: "Review the authentication changes for bugs and code quality"…
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.