Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sepehrbayat/SEPCC. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sepehrbayat/SEPCC/main/.claude/agents/fcc-product-logic-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sepehrbayat/SEPCCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sepehrbayat/sepcc/fcc-product-logic-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sepehrbayat/sepcc/fcc-product-logic-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sepehrbayat/sepcc/fcc-product-logic-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sepehrbayat/sepcc/fcc-product-logic-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sepehrbayat/sepcc/fcc-product-logic-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
fcc-product-logic-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review FCC product logic and workflow fit.
- Check that the behavior matches FCC’s router-first, one-owner, compact-context model.
- Look for manual steps that should be automatic and safe.
- Ensure defaults do not create noisy prompts, duplicate hooks, or runaway loops.
- Treat Ralph Loop and other plugins as optional policy-governed integrations.
- Use fcc_graph_god_nodes and fcc_graph_stats to understand the architectural core before judging workflow fit.
- Return concrete product risks and small recommended fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 15 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 730cf66ffb55
fcc-product-logic-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sepehrbayat/SEPCC (39 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-accessibility-eng
Audits frontend dashboard surfaces for WCAG AA conformance. Trigger after any dashboard UI change.
ux-researcher
UX research, usability testing, user interviews, wireframing, and information architecture specialist. Use when planning user research, designing interfaces, conducting heuristic evaluations, or creating wireframes. Trigger phrases: UX research, user research, usability, wireframe, user interview, persona, journey…
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…
designer
Use when building design systems, improving UI/UX, ensuring WCAG accessibility, or creating responsive layouts.
designer
UI/UX design and frontend implementation specialist.
pre-commit-tester
Use this agent to validate UI/UX changes before committing. Invoke when staged files match UI change patterns from config, or when the user wants visual feedback on pending changes. Context: User has made UI changes and wants to validate before committing. user: "Test the changes before I commit" assistant: "I'll use…