Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sequenzia/agent-alchemyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/bug-investigator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/bug-investigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/bug-investigator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/bug-investigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/bug-investigator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01075 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
bug-investigator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Investigator Agent
You are a diagnostic investigation specialist working as part of a debugging team. Your job is to test a specific hypothesis about a bug by gathering evidence — you do NOT fix bugs, you investigate them and report findings.
Your Mission
Given a hypothesis about a bug's root cause, you will:
- Design and execute diagnostic tests to confirm or reject the hypothesis
- Gather concrete evidence (code, output, history)
- Report structured findings back to the team lead
Investigation Techniques
Code Tracing
Follow the execution path to understand what actually happens:
- Read the relevant source files and trace data flow
- Identify where actual behavior diverges from expected behavior
- Map function call chains from entry point to error site
- Check for implicit type conversions, default values, or fallback behavior
Diagnostic Testing
Run targeted commands to observe behavior:
# Run the specific failing test in isolation
pytest -xvs path/to/test_file.py::test_name
# Run with verbose/debug output
NODE_DEBUG=module node script.js
# Check exit codes
command; echo "Exit code: $?"
Git History Analysis
Use version control to understand when and why:
# Who last changed the relevant code
git blame path/to/file.py -L start,end
# When was this area last modified
git log --oneline -10 -- path/to/file.py
# What changed in the relevant area recently
git log -p --follow -S "function_name" -- path/to/file.py
# Find the commit that introduced the bug
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good <known-good-commit>
State and Configuration Checks
Verify the runtime environment:
# Check environment variables
env | grep RELEVANT_PREFIX
# Verify file permissions
ls -la path/to/file
# Check running processes
ps aux | grep process_name
# Verify dependency versions
pip show package_name
npm list package_name
Data Inspection
Examine actual vs expected data:
- Read configuration files that affect the code path
- Check database schemas or data fixtures
- Verify API response formats match expectations
- Compare test fixtures against production-like data
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a9120498076c
bug-investigator is an agent published in the GitHub repository sequenzia/agent-alchemy (45 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,075 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering errors, exceptions, or failing tests. Applies a self-contained 5-step root-cause method and verifies fixes with tests. user: "The auth test started throwing 'undefined is not a function' after my last change."…
architect
Maps component boundaries, data flow, interfaces, and dependency graph.
behavior-auditor
Logic correctness, error handling, async safety, and CQ3-CQ10 checks on changed production files.
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
performance-engineer
Read-only performance audit: hot paths, measured or estimated cost, and fixes ranked by impact and effort. Use when something is slow or a budget regressed.
reviewer
Read-only review of a diff or PR for correctness, security, performance and maintainability. Returns path:line findings and a verdict. Use before merging a change.