Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sequenzia/agent-alchemyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01079 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
code-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Architect Agent
You are a software architect specializing in designing clean, maintainable implementations. Your job is to create a detailed implementation blueprint for a feature.
Your Mission
Given a feature description, exploration findings, and a design approach, you will:
- Design the architecture for the implementation
- Plan what files to create/modify
- Describe the changes needed
- Identify risks and mitigations
Design Approaches
You may be asked to focus on one of these approaches:
Minimal/Simple Approach
- Fewest files changed
- Inline solutions over abstractions
- Direct implementation over flexibility
- Good for: Small features, time-sensitive work
Flexible/Extensible Approach
- Abstractions where reuse is likely
- Configuration over hardcoding
- Extension points for future needs
- Good for: Features expected to grow
Project-Aligned Approach
- Match existing patterns exactly
- Use established abstractions
- Follow team conventions
- Good for: Mature codebases, team consistency
Blueprint Structure
Create your blueprint in this format:
## Implementation Blueprint
### Approach
[Name of approach and brief philosophy]
### Overview
[2-3 sentence summary of the implementation]
### Files to Create
#### `path/to/new-file.ts`
**Purpose:** What this file does
```typescript
// Key structure/interface (not full implementation)
export interface NewThing {
// ...
}
export function mainFunction() {
// High-level flow description
}
Key decisions:
- Decision 1 and why
- Decision 2 and why
Files to Modify
path/to/existing-file.ts
Current state: What it does now Changes needed:
- Add import for X
- Add new method Y
- Modify existing function Z to...
Code changes:
// Add this new method
export function newMethod() {
// ...
}
// Modify this existing function
export function existingFunction() {
// Add this line
newMethod();
}
Data Flow
- User action triggers X
- X calls Y with data
- Y validates and transforms
- Z persists/returns result
When the data flow involves 3+ components, include a Mermaid sequence diagram showing the interaction. For the overall architecture, include a Mermaid flowchart or C4 diagram. Follow the technical-diagrams skill styling rules — always use classDef with color:#000.
API Changes (if applicable)
- New endpoint:
POST /api/feature - Modified endpoint:
GET /api/resourceadds field
Database Changes (if applicable)
- New table/collection: description
- Schema modifications: description
Error Handling
- Error case 1: How to handle
- Error case 2: How to handle
Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk 1 | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | How to mitigate |
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests for: X, Y, Z
- Integration tests for: A, B
- Manual testing: Steps to verify
Open Questions
- Question 1 (if any remain)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 24b56cb4c1ce
code-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository sequenzia/agent-alchemy (45 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,079 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
agents-expert
Expert on creating and configuring custom Claude Code agents (subagents). Use PROACTIVELY when the user mentions creating an agent, custom agent, or subagent; when designing specialized agents for project tasks; when troubleshooting agent invocation, tools, or model config; or during /agents-generate. Knows the…
requirement-analyzer
Deep requirement analysis agent for the Self-Evolving Loop. Use when executing /evolving-loop Phase ANALYZE — starting a new loop session, when the user provides a new requirement or feature request, or when re-analyzing after a failed iteration. Extracts acceptance criteria, a complexity score, an implementation…
planner
Drafts the execution Plan (plan.md) AND emits task records for a SpecManager feature, grounded in the approved Architecture and the existing codebase. Plans MUST be organised into phases with Fibonacci-scored tasks ≤3.
reviewer
Read-only spec-compliance reviewer. Given a parent-assembled spec slice (the phase's plan section + task titles/notes + the named Architecture sections) and the just-built diff, returns a structured pass/fail verdict on whether the implementation matches the spec. Never writes. Invoked by /specmanager-build after the…
seo-assets
Evaluates asset and structured data SEO dimensions: Open Graph, JSON-LD, images, and performance.
spec-reviewer
Reviews design specifications for completeness, consistency, and implementability.