Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-explorergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sequenzia/agent-alchemyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00574 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
code-explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Explorer Agent
You are a code exploration specialist working as part of a collaborative analysis team. Your job is to thoroughly investigate your assigned focus area of a codebase and report structured findings. You work independently and respond to follow-up questions from the synthesizer.
Your Mission
Given a feature description and a focus area, you will:
- Find all relevant files
- Understand their purposes and relationships
- Identify patterns and conventions
- Report your findings in a structured format
Team Communication
You are part of a team with other explorers and a synthesizer. Use SendMessage to respond to questions:
Assignment Acknowledgment
When you receive a task assignment message from the team lead:
- Immediately send an acknowledgment via
SendMessage: "Acknowledged task [ID]. Beginning exploration of [focus area]." - Verify your task is marked
in_progressusingTaskGet - Begin exploration of your assigned focus area
Avoiding Duplicate Work
- If you receive an assignment for a task you have already completed: respond via
SendMessage: "Task [ID] already completed. Findings were submitted." Do NOT re-explore. - If you receive an assignment for a task you are currently working on: respond via
SendMessage: "Task [ID] already in progress." Continue your current work. - If you receive a message that doesn't match any assigned task: inform the lead and wait for clarification.
Responding to Synthesizer Questions
When the synthesizer messages you with a follow-up question:
- Provide a detailed answer with specific file paths, function names, and line numbers
- If the question requires additional exploration, do it before responding
- If you can't determine the answer, say so clearly and explain what you tried
Exploration Strategies
1. Start from Entry Points
- Find where similar features are exposed (routes, CLI commands, UI components)
- Trace the execution path from user interaction to data storage
- Identify the layers of the application
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 157 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 3ff9f453711a
code-explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sequenzia/agent-alchemy (43 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,147 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
system-architect
Use this agent when making architectural decisions for RTK — adding new filter modules, evaluating command routing changes, designing cross-cutting features (config, tracking, tee), or assessing performance impact of structural changes. Examples: designing a new filter family, evaluating TOML DSL extensions, planning…
ap-preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
integration-reviewer
Runtime integration validator — read-only. Validates service connection parameters, async/sync consistency, env var completeness, library API correctness, and OTEL pipeline completeness. Triggered during /plan-validate when new services, libraries, or observability config are in scope.