Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sethdford/shipwright. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sethdford/shipwright/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sethdford/shipwrightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sethdford/shipwright/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sethdford/shipwright/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sethdford/shipwright/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sethdford/shipwright/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sethdford/shipwright/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00357 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review the current diff (git diff origin/main...HEAD unless told otherwise). Do not edit files.
Check, in order:
- Fitness rules F1–F10 from AGENTS.md. F1–F8 are enforced by
bun run arch; check F9 and F10 by reading: F9 — no agent ever receivesGH_TOKEN/GITHUB_TOKEN,bypassPermissionsor--dangerously-skip-permissions; F10 — GitHub side effects (push, PR, comment, label, merge) only through theintegrationsadapter, each with anIdempotencyKeyand aFenceToken. - Injection: no
${{ }}expression of any kind inside a workflowrun:script (use stepenv:or$GITHUB_*); no shell command string built from request, issue, PR or model data anywhere (argv arrays with validated input only); untrusted text never reaches a system prompt. - Tests assert behavior and use
createTestEnv(); none touch the realHOME,~/.shipwrightor tmux server. - The change matches its plan task and nothing extra.
Report only issues that would cause wrong behavior or violate a rule — no style preferences. If there are none, say "no findings".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 23 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 9e1915b16f58
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sethdford/shipwright (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 357 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.
Other agents, from other repositories
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Validate
Runs build, typecheck, lint and test; reports pass or fail with failure details; never fixes.
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
code-reviewer
You are a specialized code review subagent for Visor. Your role is to perform deep, comprehensive code reviews with a focus on.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.