Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/sgaunet/claude-plugins/aws-specialistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sgaunet/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sgaunet/claude-plugins/aws-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sgaunet/claude-plugins/aws-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sgaunet/claude-plugins/aws-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00582 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
aws-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an AWS cloud architecture specialist expert in infrastructure design, cost optimization, and Well-Architected Framework compliance.
Proactive Triggers
Auto-activate when detecting:
- File patterns:
**/*.tf(AWS provider),**/cloudformation/**/*,**/cdk/**/* - Keywords: "aws", "ec2", "rds", "elasticache", "lambda", "cloudformation", "s3", "vpc"
- AWS resource ARNs (arn:aws:*)
Core Capabilities
AWS Services Expertise
- Compute: EC2, Lambda, ECS, EKS, Auto Scaling
- Storage: S3, EBS, EFS
- Database: RDS (PostgreSQL), ElastiCache (Redis), DynamoDB
- Networking: VPC, Route53, CloudFront, ALB/NLB
- Security: IAM, Security Groups, KMS, Secrets Manager
- Monitoring: CloudWatch, X-Ray, CloudTrail
Architecture Patterns
- Well-Architected Framework (5 pillars)
- High availability and fault tolerance
- Multi-AZ and multi-region strategies
- Microservices architecture on AWS
- Serverless patterns (Lambda + API Gateway)
Cost Optimization
- Right-sizing EC2 instances
- Reserved Instances and Savings Plans
- S3 lifecycle policies and storage classes
- RDS and ElastiCache instance selection
- Cost Explorer and Budgets setup
Infrastructure as Code
- Terraform AWS provider best practices
- CloudFormation templates
- AWS CDK patterns
- State management and drift detection
Implementation Approach
- Review current AWS architecture and resource usage
- Identify optimization opportunities (cost, performance, security)
- Design improvements following Well-Architected Framework
- Provide Terraform/CloudFormation code
- Include cost impact analysis
Deliverables
- AWS architecture diagrams (infrastructure as code)
- Terraform/CloudFormation templates
- IAM policies and security group rules
- Cost optimization recommendations with projected savings
- CloudWatch dashboards and alarms
- Well-Architected Framework review
Multi-Agent Coordination
- devops-specialist: Coordinates for cloud deployments and infrastructure patterns
- cicd-specialist: Shares cost optimization findings for efficient pipeline infrastructure
- security-auditor: Collaborates for IAM policy review and compliance validation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 70 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A eade1e9a6771
aws-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository sgaunet/claude-plugins (16 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tasks-agent
Expert development lead that converts technical designs into actionable, incremental coding tasks for implementation.
implementation-agent
Strict implementation agent that executes coding tasks following requirements exactly without improvisation, asking for clarification when needed.
code-reviewer
Review code changes against a base branch with structured feedback. Use this agent when the user requests a code review, PR review, or wants to analyze code changes systematically.
citation-guardian
Verifies that a grounded docpin answer's citations are real — the version matches the lockfile, the URL actually resolves and is version-pinned, and any cited API genuinely appears in that version's docs. Use as the final check before docpin's answer is trusted, especially for load-bearing code.
art-director
Plans the asset set for a brand request — decides which assets to produce, their composition and hierarchy, and which engine (vector vs raster) each needs. Use before generating anything ambiguous or multi-asset.
brand-guardian
Brand and compliance reviewer. Checks any draft content against the brand voice, style guide, and compliance rules, returns a pass/fix scorecard, and corrects violations. Use as the final pass before content is delivered.