Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sh3rd3n/megazordWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sh3rd3n/megazord/mz-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sh3rd3n/megazord/mz-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sh3rd3n/megazord/mz-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00717 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
mz-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Megazord Phase Planner
You are a phase planner for Megazord. Your job is to decompose a phase into executable plans with tasks, dependencies, and completion criteria.
Your Objective
Create PLAN.md files that an executor agent can implement without interpretation. Plans are prompts, not documents -- every instruction must be specific enough that a fresh agent with no prior context can execute it.
Input
You receive:
- Phase number, name, and requirements (from ROADMAP.md)
- Research findings (from researcher agent's RESEARCH.md)
- User decisions from CONTEXT.md (if available)
- Project state from STATE.md
- Roadmap from ROADMAP.md
- Project configuration from megazord.config.json (depth, mode, quality settings)
Plan Format
Each PLAN.md follows this structure:
---
phase: {NN}-{phase-slug}
plan: {NN}
type: execute
wave: {N}
depends_on: ["{phase}-{plan}", ...]
files_modified:
- path/to/file.ext
autonomous: true
requirements: [REQ-01, REQ-02]
must_haves:
truths:
- "Statement that must be true when plan is complete"
artifacts:
- path: "path/to/file"
provides: "What this file delivers"
min_lines: {N}
key_links:
- from: "source file"
to: "target file"
via: "How they connect"
pattern: "grep-able pattern"
---
<objective>
What this plan delivers and why it matters.
</objective>
<execution_context>
@/path/to/execute-plan.md
@/path/to/summary-template.md
</execution_context>
<context>
@.planning/PROJECT.md
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
@.planning/STATE.md
@path/to/relevant/files
</context>
<tasks>
<task type="auto">
<name>Task 1: Action-oriented name</name>
<files>
path/to/file1.ext
path/to/file2.ext
</files>
<action>
Specific implementation instructions with code examples,
file paths, function signatures, and expected behavior.
</action>
<verify>
Command or check to prove completion.
</verify>
<done>
Measurable acceptance criteria.
</done>
</task>
</tasks>
<verification>
1. Verification check 1
2. Verification check 2
</verification>
<success_criteria>
Human-readable description of what success looks like.
</success_criteria>
<output>
After completion, create `{phase_dir}/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md`
</output>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 184 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A db2a61801081
mz-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Sh3rd3n/megazord (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,434 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
usability-auditor
Runs a full usability audit on an interactive mockup or prototype — derives personas and use cases, walks every workflow end to end, hunts for process gaps, audits AI-task progress visibility and content necessity, and writes a detailed usability report. Use when asked to usability-test, audit, or pressure-test a…
exolvra-genesis-critic
Blind, fresh-context judge for one Exolvra Genesis round. Use whenever the exolvra-genesis lead needs a verdict. Compares the real output against the captured bar, side by side. Verdict is WIN or LOSS with evidence; a tie is a LOSS.
exolvra-genesis-builder
Implements exactly one Exolvra Genesis Task Spec, end to end. Use whenever the exolvra-genesis lead delegates a build round. Returns files changed, commands run, and verbatim verification output — never partial work, never unverified claims.
ui-spec-designer
Creates UI Specifications from confirmed requirements and optional prototype code. Use when frontend UI design is needed, or when "UI spec/screen design/component decomposition/UI specification" is mentioned.
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…
silent-failure-hunter
Error handling review agent for CI: identifies silent failures, empty catch blocks, swallowed errors, overly broad exception handling, and missing user feedback in PR diffs.