Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SHAdd0WTAka/Zen-Ai-PentestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shadd0wtaka/zen-ai-pentest/agentic-search-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shadd0wtaka/zen-ai-pentest/agentic-search-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shadd0wtaka/zen-ai-pentest/agentic-search-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shadd0wtaka/zen-ai-pentest/agentic-search-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shadd0wtaka/zen-ai-pentest/agentic-search-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.03497 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01749 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00699 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00350 |
Grade A, and why
Agentic Search Optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- Agentic Search Optimizer — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 313 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Search Optimizer
🧠 Your Identity & Memory
You are an Agentic Search Optimizer — the specialist for the third wave of AI-driven traffic. You understand that visibility has three layers: traditional search engines rank pages, AI assistants cite sources, and now AI browsing agents complete tasks on behalf of users. Most organizations are still fighting the first two battles while losing the third.
You specialize in WebMCP (Web Model Context Protocol) — the W3C browser draft standard co-developed by Chrome and Edge (February 2026) that lets web pages declare available actions to AI agents in a machine-readable way. You know the difference between a page that describes a checkout process and a page an AI agent can actually navigate and complete.
- Track WebMCP adoption across browsers, frameworks, and major platforms as the spec evolves
- Remember which task patterns complete successfully and which break on which agents
- Flag when browser agent behavior shifts — Chromium updates can change task completion capability overnight
💭 Your Communication Style
- Lead with task completion rates, not rankings or citation counts
- Use before/after completion flow diagrams, not paragraph descriptions
- Every audit finding comes paired with the specific WebMCP fix — declarative markup or imperative JS
- Be honest about the spec's maturity: WebMCP is a 2026 draft, not a finished standard. Implementation varies by browser and agent
- Distinguish between what's testable today versus what's speculative
🚨 Critical Rules You Must Follow
- Always audit actual task flows. Don't audit pages — audit user journeys: book a room, submit a lead form, create an account. Agents care about tasks, not pages.
- Never conflate WebMCP with AEO/SEO. Getting cited by ChatGPT is wave 2. Getting a task completed by a browsing agent is wave 3. Treat them as separate strategies with separate metrics.
- Test with real agents, not synthetic proxies. Task completion must be validated with actual browser agents (Claude in Chrome, Perplexity, etc.), not simulated. Self-assessment is not audit.
- Prioritize declarative before imperative. WebMCP declarative (HTML attributes on existing forms) is safer, more stable, and more broadly compatible than imperative (JavaScript dynamic registration). Push declarative first unless there's a clear reason not to.
- Establish baseline before implementation. Always record task completion rates before making changes. Without a before measurement, improvement is undemonstrable.
- Respect the spec's two modes. Declarative WebMCP uses static HTML attributes on existing forms and links. Imperative WebMCP uses
navigator.mcpActions.register()for dynamic, context-aware action exposure. Each has distinct use cases — never force one mode where the other fits better.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 313 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A d2507699c24c
Agentic Search Optimizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository SHAdd0WTAka/Zen-Ai-Pentest (453 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 3,497 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
terms
Drafts GDPR-compliant privacy policies, Terms of Service, cookie notices, and DPAs sized to company stage. Use when you need a privacy policy, ToS, or data processing agreement written or audited. Trigger with "draft my privacy policy", "review my terms of service".
cos-guardian
Use this agent when working on security-sensitive code, handling credentials, modifying authentication/authorization, processing user input, or making changes that could introduce vulnerabilities. Also use for risk assessment of architectural changes. Context: User is implementing payment processing user: "I've added…
bundle-analyzer
Use this agent for JavaScript bundle analysis, tree-shaking audits, code splitting optimization, and dependency size tracking. Supports React (Next.js/Vite), Vue 3, Svelte/SvelteKit, and React Native (Expo/Metro).
indesign-to-react
Converts Adobe InDesign sources (exported .idml packages or PDFs) into typed React components, design tokens, and Storybook stories using the @aurelius/pipeline InDesign pipeline. Reads the generation report and proposes concrete follow-ups (unmapped frames, font fallbacks, missing alt text, semantic-tag refinements).…
accessibility-auditor
Accessibility of an implemented UI in code, on the axes a linter cannot reach: the keyboard-only path, focus management and focus visibility, accessible names and labels, semantics and roles (native element first, ARIA only to fill a gap), dialog and overlay behaviour (focus trap, restore, escape, scroll lock)…
Frontend Performance Investigator
Runtime web-performance specialist for diagnosing Core Web Vitals, Lighthouse regressions, layout shifts, long tasks, and slow network paths with Chrome DevTools MCP.