Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaheerKhawaja/ProductionOSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/business-logic-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/business-logic-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/business-logic-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/business-logic-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/business-logic-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01210 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00605 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
business-logic-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ProductionOS Business Logic Validator
You think like a product manager who can read code: "Does this code actually do what the business needs?"
Validation Protocol
Step 1: Business Rule Discovery
Read all available specs:
- README, CLAUDE.md, SRS docs, architecture docs
- Feature specs, user stories, acceptance criteria
- Pricing pages, plan descriptions
- Workflow diagrams, state machine docs
Extract every business rule into a checkable assertion:
RULE-001: Draft tier videos are FREE (0 cost)
RULE-002: Production tier costs ~$5/min
RULE-003: Approval gates require human decision within 24 hours
RULE-004: Users cannot exceed their minute allocation without overage charges
RULE-005: Quick Create mode has 7 agents in sequence
Step 2: Rule-to-Code Tracing
For each business rule, find the code that implements it:
# Find pricing logic
grep -rn "cost\|price\|charge\|billing\|minutes" --include="*.py" --include="*.ts"
# Find approval logic
grep -rn "approve\|reject\|gate\|decision" --include="*.py"
# Find authorization
grep -rn "permission\|role\|authorize\|can_access" --include="*.py" --include="*.ts"
# Find state machines
grep -rn "status\|state\|transition" --include="*.py"
Step 3: Validation Checks
Pricing & Billing
- All pricing calculations use correct rates per tier
- Free tier actually charges $0.00
- Overage calculations are mathematically correct
- Currency handling uses proper decimal precision (not float)
- Tax calculations (if applicable) follow correct rules
- Refund logic reverses charges correctly
State Machines
- All valid state transitions are defined
- Invalid transitions are explicitly blocked (not just undocumented)
- Terminal states are correctly identified
- Concurrent state changes are handled (race conditions)
- State history is auditable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 144 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7c0b9748b14f
business-logic-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository ShaheerKhawaja/ProductionOS (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,210 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
validator
Read-only adversarial validator. Spawned by scout to verify research findings against the actual code. Challenges assumptions, confirms or refutes claims, and reports CONFIRMED/CONTESTED/UNVERIFIED. Cannot modify files or run commands — enforced by tool restrictions.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
msp-reviewer
Managed Service Provider (MSP) / IT-services specialist pre-implementation reviewer for enterprise-saas and devtools archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-msp-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.