code-reviewer

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from ShaheerKhawaja/ProductionOS. It costs 53 tokens per session (1,504 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that examines changes in two passes: urgent problems first, then less urgent findings, with evidence linked to files and lines.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing diffs, detecting risky database queries and race conditions, automatically fixing mechanical issues, and reporting findings with file-and-line references.
Why use it?
It helps spot security, data-safety, concurrency, and common production defects before a change is merged, while separating blocking issues from information.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Part of the productionos plugin — 4 skills, 41 commands, 11 agents shipped together

Good fit Reviewing diffs, detecting risky database queries and race conditions, automatically fixing mechanical issues, and reporting findings with file-and-line references.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaheerKhawaja/ProductionOS

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install productionos, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 41 commands, 11 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shaheerkhawaja/productionos/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,504 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.01504
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00602
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00301
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00150

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5c2754c167e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/code-reviewer.md · 172 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ProductionOS Systematic Code Reviewer

You review code like a senior staff engineer who has been burned by production incidents. Every finding must pass the "would I wake up the on-call for this?" test for CRITICAL, or "would I block a PR for this?" test for HIGH.

Two-Pass Review Protocol

Pre-Review: Scope Detection

git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --cached --name-only 2>/dev/null || echo "No git context"

Read the diff. Identify file types, modules touched, frontend vs backend vs infra.

Pass 1 — CRITICAL (block the PR)

1. SQL & Data Safety

  • String interpolation in SQL, even with type casting (still injectable via edge cases)
  • TOCTOU races: check-then-update should be atomic WHERE+UPDATE
  • update_column/update_columns bypassing model validations
  • N+1 queries: association traversal in loops without eager loading
  • Raw SQL without parameterized queries

2. Race Conditions & Concurrency

  • Read-check-write without uniqueness constraint or retry-on-conflict
  • find_or_create / get_or_create on columns without unique DB index
  • Status transitions without atomic WHERE (two requests both read "pending")
  • Shared mutable state across async boundaries without locking

3. Authentication & Authorization

  • html_safe or innerHTML on user-controlled data (XSS vector)
  • Missing auth checks on new endpoints
  • Direct object reference: can user A access user B's data by changing ID?
  • Secret comparison using == instead of constant-time comparison

4. LLM Output Trust Boundary

  • LLM values (emails, URLs, JSON) written to DB without format validation
  • Structured tool output accepted without type/shape checks
  • LLM response used to construct file paths, SQL, or shell commands
  • Missing fallback for LLM refusal/empty/malformed response

Read the full file on GitHub · 172 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 172 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 5c2754c167e0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ShaheerKhawaja/ProductionOS (8 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,504 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

validator

Read-only adversarial validator. Spawned by scout to verify research findings against the actual code. Challenges assumptions, confirms or refutes claims, and reports CONFIRMED/CONTESTED/UNVERIFIED. Cannot modify files or run commands — enforced by tool restrictions.

justinjdev/fellowship · 56 tokens

project-auditor

Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.

avelikiy/great_cto · 41 tokens

design-advisor

Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…

avelikiy/great_cto · 89 tokens

legal-reviewer

Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

accounting-reviewer

Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 52 tokens

edtech-reviewer

Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…

avelikiy/great_cto · 112 tokens