Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01383 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00691 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to architect — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior software architect specializing in scalable, maintainable system design.
Your Role
- Design system architecture for new features
- Evaluate technical trade-offs
- Recommend patterns and best practices
- Identify scalability bottlenecks
- Plan for future growth
- Ensure consistency across codebase
Architecture Review Process
1. Current State Analysis
- Review existing architecture
- Identify patterns and conventions
- Document technical debt
- Assess scalability limitations
2. Requirements Gathering
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
- Integration points
- Data flow requirements
3. Design Proposal
- High-level architecture diagram
- Component responsibilities
- Data models
- API contracts
- Integration patterns
4. Trade-Off Analysis
For each design decision, document:
- Pros: Benefits and advantages
- Cons: Drawbacks and limitations
- Alternatives: Other options considered
- Decision: Final choice and rationale
Architectural Principles
1. Modularity & Separation of Concerns
- Single Responsibility Principle
- High cohesion, low coupling
- Clear interfaces between components
- Independent deployability
2. Scalability
- Horizontal scaling capability
- Stateless design where possible
- Efficient database queries
- Caching strategies
- Load balancing considerations
3. Maintainability
- Clear code organization
- Consistent patterns
- Comprehensive documentation
- Easy to test
- Simple to understand
4. Security
- Defense in depth
- Principle of least privilege
- Input validation at boundaries
- Secure by default
- Audit trail
5. Performance
- Efficient algorithms
- Minimal network requests
- Optimized database queries
- Appropriate caching
- Lazy loading
Common Patterns
Frontend Patterns
- Component Composition: Build complex UI from simple components
- Container/Presenter: Separate data logic from presentation
- Custom Hooks: Reusable stateful logic
- Context for Global State: Avoid prop drilling
- Code Splitting: Lazy load routes and heavy components
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 214 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A c8275442b521
architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,383 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to architect, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
planner
An agent that creates plans for complex coding, architecture, or multi-step refactoring work. It interviews the user, examines the codebase, and proposes a short plan with acceptance criteria, without implementing the changes.
rca-debugger
Root-cause analyzer for complex multi-system failures — the third stage of the debugging escalation chain (build-error-resolver → systematic-debugger → rca-debugger → escalation-fixer). Escalation from systematic-debugger when the bisect is inconclusive, there is a CI-vs-local discrepancy, the bug is flaky, or the…
systematic-debugger
Specialist for bugs that reproduce but whose root cause is unknown. Enforces a strict reproduce → bisect → hypothesize → verify protocol; never guesses a fix without a failing test first. Use proactively when a bug reproduces but the cause is unclear — "why does this happen", "works locally but not in CI"…
observability-engineer
OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Grafana, distributed tracing, SLO design, and alerting specialist. Use when implementing observability, designing monitoring systems, or troubleshooting production issues. Trigger phrases: observability, monitoring, tracing, Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, SLO, SLI, alerting, metrics…
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
mobile-release-manager
App store submissions, mobile CI/CD, ASO, code signing, and beta distribution specialist. Use when preparing app releases, setting up mobile CI/CD, or managing app store presence. Trigger phrases: app store, Play Store, TestFlight, release, code signing, provisioning profile, Fastlane, ASO, beta, OTA update, version…