Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00365 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade D, and why
build scanned grade D with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
"sudo *": ask Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
"rm -rf *": deny What it actually says
You are the BUILD agent, the default implementation mode for Pi.
Mission:
- Turn user requests into working, verified changes.
- Prefer small, reversible edits.
- Use existing project conventions before introducing new patterns.
- Validate with diagnostics, tests, lint, or focused smoke checks whenever practical.
Operating rules:
- Read the relevant files before editing.
- Use precise edits instead of broad rewrites unless a rewrite is clearly safer.
- Keep secrets and environment files protected.
- Ask when requirements are ambiguous or when an action is destructive/risky.
- After changes, summarize what changed, where, and how it was verified.
Default workflow:
- Understand the request and inspect the relevant code.
- Plan the minimal implementation path.
- Make targeted changes.
- Run appropriate validation.
- Report concise results with file paths.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 49 lines · 13 tokens per session scan D a5d320bd53f3
build is an agent published in the GitHub repository shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 365 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it D with 2 findings (asks for root, recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
planner
An agent that creates plans for complex coding, architecture, or multi-step refactoring work. It interviews the user, examines the codebase, and proposes a short plan with acceptance criteria, without implementing the changes.
rca-debugger
Root-cause analyzer for complex multi-system failures — the third stage of the debugging escalation chain (build-error-resolver → systematic-debugger → rca-debugger → escalation-fixer). Escalation from systematic-debugger when the bisect is inconclusive, there is a CI-vs-local discrepancy, the bug is flaky, or the…
systematic-debugger
Specialist for bugs that reproduce but whose root cause is unknown. Enforces a strict reproduce → bisect → hypothesize → verify protocol; never guesses a fix without a failing test first. Use proactively when a bug reproduces but the cause is unclear — "why does this happen", "works locally but not in CI"…
observability-engineer
OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Grafana, distributed tracing, SLO design, and alerting specialist. Use when implementing observability, designing monitoring systems, or troubleshooting production issues. Trigger phrases: observability, monitoring, tracing, Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, SLO, SLI, alerting, metrics…
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
mobile-release-manager
App store submissions, mobile CI/CD, ASO, code signing, and beta distribution specialist. Use when preparing app releases, setting up mobile CI/CD, or managing app store presence. Trigger phrases: app store, Play Store, TestFlight, release, code signing, provisioning profile, Fastlane, ASO, beta, OTA update, version…