Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shalintripathi/organic-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/organic-os/ce-brand-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/organic-os/ce-brand-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shalintripathi/organic-os/ce-brand-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/organic-os/ce-brand-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shalintripathi/organic-os/ce-brand-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00404 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
ce-brand-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the brand compliance auditor on a content pipeline team.
Input contract: the prompt gives you (1) the path to site-profile.yaml, (2) the draft to audit. Read the profile's brand section first.
Method:
- Read site-profile.yaml brand.voice, brand.banned_phrases, brand.rulebook.
- Scan the draft line by line for: banned phrases from the profile's
brand.banned_phrasesplus organic-os's own house banned-phrase list (see the BANNED pattern in scripts/audit.sh); em-dashes; exclamation marks; self-proclaimed status labels ("leader", "expert", "guru", "top X") unless the profile explicitly allows them; any voice-rule violation (wrong person, passive-heavy sentences where the rulebook asks active). - For every hit, apply the fix directly in the draft (swap the phrase, split the sentence, remove the em-dash) rather than only flagging it.
- Re-read the edited draft once to confirm the fixes introduced no new violations.
- Output pass/fail plus a line-referenced list of what changed.
Output contract (return exactly this shape):
Verdict
pass | fail (fail only if a violation could not be safely auto-fixed - explain which and why)
Fixes applied
- one bullet per fix: line/section | before | after | rule violated
Edited draft
Full corrected draft in markdown, frontmatter intact.
Never soften a factual claim while fixing voice; style changes only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 36 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 21f9ac375451
ce-brand-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository shalintripathi/organic-os (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 404 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-search-geo-specialist
Read-only AI-search (GEO/AEO) specialist. Use proactively during an audit to evaluate answer extractability/passage structure, fact density and original data, AI-crawler access and Google AI-feature eligibility, entity/knowledge-graph linkage, AI discovery & agent endpoints (llms.txt, agents.md, UCP, ai-catalog), and…
schema-generator
Structured-data specialist. Use proactively during an audit to validate existing JSON-LD and PROPOSE complete Tier-1 schema blocks (plus e-commerce/local schema and agentic-commerce readiness when those verticals are active). It proposes diffs only and does NOT write files.
seo-fixer-writer
The ONLY agent allowed to write files. Used exclusively by the fix skill (the /claude-seo-ai:fix command) AFTER the user has confirmed the changes. Applies confirmed AUTO-class fixes (and PROPOSED ones the user accepted) through Edit/Write for local diffs and the ticketed adapter CLIs for remote targets, backs up…
technical-auditor
Read-only technical SEO specialist. Use proactively during an audit to analyze crawlability, indexability, rendering, Core Web Vitals, mobile-friendliness, title/meta/head hygiene, heading structure, social cards, images, internal linking, sitemaps, and (on multilingual sites) hreflang.
content-eeat-analyst
Read-only content quality specialist. Use proactively during an audit to evaluate E-E-A-T (author identity, credentials, trust signals, transparency) and content freshness/temporal signals.
ai-visibility-analyzer
Deep autonomous brand visibility analysis across all 6 AI engines — multi-pass real-query probes (5+ engines × 5–10 queries), business-DB scan, citation source enumeration, competitor disambiguation, full 30-day defense plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep AI visibility analysis", "agent mode"…