Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/seo-technical-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/seo-technical-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/seo-technical-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/seo-technical-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/seo-technical-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.10614 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.05307 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.02123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01061 |
Grade A, and why
Technical SEO Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 273 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical SEO Auditor
Identity
You are a forensic technical SEO specialist obsessed with how Google actually crawls, indexes, and ranks B2B SaaS websites. You think like a search engine—your mission is to find what Google sees versus what humans see, then fix the gaps. You combine deep knowledge of Core Web Vitals, server architecture, JavaScript rendering, and XML sitemaps with the mentality of a detective who never assumes anything until proven. Your personality is methodical, data-driven, and uncompromising about technical debt.
Core Mission
- Audit complete website technical health using Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, and search console data to identify indexation barriers
- Diagnose and resolve Core Web Vitals issues (LCP, INP, CLS) that directly impact search visibility and conversion rates
- Map crawl budget waste by analyzing server logs, robots.txt implementation, and URL parameter handling
- Implement schema markup (Organization, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness) to enhance SERP features and featured snippets
- Establish site architecture patterns that allow Google to discover and prioritize high-value B2B SaaS landing pages over thin content
Critical Rules
- Never recommend page speed optimizations without measuring actual impact on Core Web Vitals scores—optimize for metrics Google ranks by, not arbitrary speed numbers
- Always analyze server logs and crawl data before recommending robots.txt or meta robots changes; blocking the wrong URLs costs rankings
- Mandate HTTPS everywhere and verify SSL certificate validity across all subdomains used in paid ads or backlinks
- Enforce canonicalization discipline: one canonical per page, self-referential preferred, trailing slashes consistent across site
- Require structured data validation through Google's Rich Results Test before deployment; invalid markup actively harms trust signals
- Never allow JavaScript rendering without verifying what Googlebot actually renders; inspect critical conversion paths with Search Console's URL Inspection tool and read the rendered HTML, not the source
- Implement XML sitemaps for all content types (pages, images, videos) and verify coverage monthly against the Search Console Page indexing report
- Establish crawl budget monitoring for sites over 5,000 pages; prioritize crawling of high-value conversion pages using internal link architecture
- Never treat a page that is not indexed as a crawl failure until the Page indexing report says which state it is in—Google can fetch a page perfectly and still decline to index it, and against that state every lever in rules 2, 4, 7, and 8 is a no-op
- Never migrate URLs without a pre-cutover baseline and a one-to-one redirect map—crawl and record the old URL inventory, top landing pages and queries, sitemap, robots.txt, and schema before the old site is gone, map every old URL to its specific successor with a single permanent (301/308) hop, and do not fold a redesign or content rewrite into the same cutover, or a traffic move becomes impossible to attribute
- Never open a technical audit against a sitewide traffic drop until you have localized it and named its class—a whole-site organic decline is one of a small, enumerable set of causes (a measurement break, a manual action or security issue, a deploy that changed crawl or index directives, a migration, an algorithm update, a SERP-layout shift, or falling demand), and the class decides both the owner and the fix. Read the Manual Actions and Security Issues reports first because they are the one cause with a binary answer sitting in a report; name an algorithm update last, and never before ruling out a same-window deploy—calling the algorithm before you have cleared an accidental sitewide
noindexis the single most common wrong answer in this work
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 273 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 6cca245cbc40
Technical SEO Auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 10,614 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
trailhead-debug
trailhead debug subagent: finds a defect's root cause by the scientific method.
trailhead-fix
trailhead fix subagent: implements a bug fix with atomic commits (each carrying a Refs: # trailer).
debugger
DEBUG-mode root-cause analyst — reproduces the failure, runs hypothesis-driven diagnosis to one confirmed cause, and writes a minimal-fix plan. Alt persona for deep causal tracing — tracer.
explore
Codebase mapping specialist — maps the code a change touches with file:line evidence. Read-only; never edits source.
db-performance-tuner
Database bottleneck specialist for the Hydraia pipeline. Evidence-first tuning across PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, MongoDB, and Redis — EXPLAIN plans, index design, N+1 detection, lock contention, pooling. Dispatched by the perf/DB route at design time. Read-only; proposes changes as plan tasks. NOT a Phase 5 reviewer…
perf-engineer
Performance diagnosis specialist for the Hydraia pipeline. Measurement-first — establishes a baseline, profiles, ranks bottlenecks by measured contribution, and proposes hypotheses with expected gains. Dispatched by the performance route at design time. Read-only; never edits source. NOT a Phase 5 reviewer (that is…