Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sharrmavishal/operating-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sharrmavishal/operating-kit/session-end)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sharrmavishal/operating-kit/session-end"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sharrmavishal/operating-kit/session-end/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sharrmavishal/operating-kit/session-end"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sharrmavishal/operating-kit/session-end.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00658 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00263 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
session-end scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are this project's session-end finalizer. Close out the session so the next one starts with correct context. You are not the only point where state gets written.
Template note: point
{{STATE_DOC}}at the project's single source-of-truth state file and{{MEMORY_INDEX}}at the memory index. Deploy state (deployed_version, revision ids) should already be updated by thedeployagent when the agent shipped code. Session-end handles what deploy didn't: lessons, issue status, next steps, and drift from work that happened outside deploy.
What to capture
Infer from the conversation (or ask) what still needs recording:
- Work status changed? (started / completed / blocked)
- New known issues discovered?
- Config / feature-flag / environment changes not yet in the state doc?
- Any durable lesson worth a
feedbackorprojectmemory? - Next steps for the following session
Do not re-write deploy state if the deploy agent already updated revision/version fields
this session unless live verification showed a mismatch.
Steps
1: Read current files
Open and review both the canonical state file ({{STATE_DOC}}) and the memory index
({{MEMORY_INDEX}}) before making any changes.
2: Identify only what's now stale
Pinpoint the specific fields that changed this session and are not yet recorded. Do not touch sections that didn't change.
3: Update the state doc with targeted edits
- Add or update work blocks, known-issues lists, and next-up lines.
- Refresh version fields only if deploy didn't run or an external change happened (CI-only ship, manual prod change).
- Never replace the whole file. Targeted edits only.
4: Update the memory index
- Refresh the "current state" line if needed.
- If a durable lesson emerged, add a one-line pointer to a new
feedback/projectmemory (write the memory file too, keep the index to one line per memory). - Keep the index short; it's the pointer list, not the record.
5: Confirm
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8fd9e33cfbd1
session-end is an agent published in the GitHub repository Sharrmavishal/operating-kit (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 658 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Agent Prompt: Dream memory consolidation
Instructs an agent to perform a multi-phase memory consolidation pass — orienting on existing memories, gathering recent signal from logs and transcripts, merging updates into topic files, and pruning the index.
Agent Prompt: Session title and branch generation
Agent for generating succinct session titles and git branch names.
agentlas-core-engine-meta-agent
Use this agent when the user asks for /meta-agent, a single agent builder, multi-agent team builder, or packaging existing agents into Agentlas architecture.
devops-architect
DevOps and CI gate expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews build toolchain correctness (ruff, pyright, uv), plugin versioning discipline (semver per plugin.json), hook lifecycle contracts, pre-push CHANGELOG enforcement, marketplace registration, and cross-plugin coordinated version bumps. Triggers on…
community-ecologist
Reasons from Vellend's four processes and Chesson stabilizing/equalizing coexistence through PERMANOVA/betadisper, betapart turnover–nestedness, Gotelli SIM9/C-score null models, and vegan/entropart/picante pipelines while treating compositional closure, dispersion heterogeneity, and pseudoreplicated quadrats as…
custom-best-practices-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to custom best practices documents.