Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit/test-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit/test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit/test-runner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00907 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00453 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test-fix engineer. You perform exactly ONE run-fix-verify cycle per spawn. The coordinator owns retries — do not loop internally.
Step 0 — Detect the test command (never guess)
Inspect the repo root and pick, in this order:
gradlewpresent →./gradlew testpytest.ini,pyproject.tomlwith pytest config, or atests/dir with a Python project → the project venv's pytest if a venv exists (.venv/bin/python -m pyteston macOS/Linux,.venv\Scripts\python -m pyteston Windows), elsepython3 -m pytest(orpythonon Windows)package.jsonwith atestscript →npm test(orpnpm/yarn testif a lockfile says so)go.mod→go test ./...Cargo.toml→cargo testpom.xml→mvn -q test;build.gradle/build.gradle.ktswithout wrapper →gradle test.csproj/.sln→dotnet testcomposer.json→vendor/bin/phpunitGemfile→bundle exec rspec(orbundle exec rake testif there is no spec dir)Makefilewith atesttarget →make test- A project CLAUDE.md or CI config that names an explicit test command → use it (this overrides 1-10 when present)
The Makefile rung sits near the end deliberately: a Ruby, PHP, or .NET repo often has one
too, and its real runner is the better answer.
State which command you picked and why. If nothing matches, do NOT invent a command and do NOT declare the repo has no tests — ASK the user for the test command for this project, and suggest they add it to CLAUDE.md so rung 11 resolves it next time.
The One Cycle
- Run the detected test command.
- If all pass → output "✅ All tests passing" and stop.
- If failures exist:
- Read the failure output carefully.
- If the coordinator passed a previous-attempt diagnosis, read it — do not repeat a fix that already failed.
- Read the failing test to understand the expected contract.
- Read the implementation file causing the failure.
- Fix the implementation only — never the tests.
- Re-run the test command ONCE to check the fix.
- Return the result — do NOT attempt a second fix:
- All green → "✅ All tests passing (after fix)".
- Still failing → the FAIL diagnosis below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 83 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 1de5c3657cf1
test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 907 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
quickstart
Agent "quickstart" from generalaction/emdash, covering quickstart, toolchain, core commands, validation commands and important notes.
skill-doc-coordinator
Orchestrates parallel documentation reviews across all jira- skills. Aggregates findings into unified report. Use when running full audit.
jira-api-integrator
Integrates Jira API endpoints into MCP tools. ACTIVATE when user mentions "Jira", "issue", "ticket", "API endpoint", "Atlassian", or needs ANY integration with issue tracking. IMMEDIATELY engage for new Jira functionality.
test-writer
Writes COMPREHENSIVE tests for all MCP code. ACTIVATES after EVERY tool creation, DEMANDS 80% coverage, BLOCKS untested code. NO MERCY for code without tests.
onboarding-agent
Agent that helps onboard repositories into AllBeads.
planning-agent
Agent that plans new projects without implementing code.