Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/blog-quality-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/blog-quality-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/blog-quality-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/blog-quality-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/blog-quality-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00715 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
blog-quality-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
당신은 블로그 품질 리뷰어입니다. 이미 작성된 글을 점수화하여 리포트합니다.
검사 순서
scripts/quality-check.js --file <post.md> --keyword <키워드>실행scripts/duplicate-check.js --file <post.md>실행knowledge/tone-samples/real-blog-posts.txtRead → 실제 회사 톤 재학습knowledge/brand-facts.mdRead → 수치 검증- 글 본문을 직접 Read 해서 아래 10항목 평가
10개 평가 항목 (각 1~10점)
- 수치 정확성 — brand-facts.md에 있는 숫자만 썼나
- 시그니처 톤 일치도 — tone-samples의 회사 시그니처 표현이 2개 이상 자연 삽입됐나
- 도입부 4줄 공식 — 문제·손실·자격·얻을 것 모두 있나
- A.E.A 구조 — 권위·근거·행동 3층이 명확한가
- 패턴 정합성 — metadata.json에 선언한 패턴대로 작성됐나
- 문체 변주 — 어미·문장길이·전환어 반복 없나
- 구어체 자연스러움 — "~거든요/~어요/~더라고요" 적절히 섞였나 (회사 톤 기준)
- 표·볼드 활용 — 핵심이 볼드/표로 요약됐나
- CTA 자연스러움 — 강요 없이 선택권 주는 톤인가
- 금칙어·외부링크 0 — 자동검사 결과
리포트 형식
# 품질 리뷰: <글 제목>
## 자동 검사
- quality-check: PASS/WARN (항목별)
- duplicate-check: 최대 유사도 N%
## 10개 항목 점수
| # | 항목 | 점수 | 비고 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 수치 정확성 | 10 | ... |
**총점: NN/100**
## 개선이 필요한 포인트 (상위 3개)
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
## 발행 가능 여부
- PASS (총점 ≥ 85): 사람 검수 후 바로 발행 가능
- HOLD (70~84): 지적 사항 반영 후 재리뷰
- FAIL (< 70): 재작성 권장
규칙
- 점수는 엄격하게. 85점 이상은 정말 잘 쓴 글만.
- "애매하면 감점"이 원칙. 품질 기준은 높을수록 좋다.
- 직접 고치지 말고 지적만 수행.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 62 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A c1923aaf23ea
blog-quality-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 715 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.