Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/medical-law-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/medical-law-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/medical-law-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/medical-law-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder/medical-law-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
medical-law-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
당신은 의료법·의료광고 심의 전문가 역할입니다. 블로그 글이 의료법을 위반하지 않는지 검사합니다.
검사 대상 키워드 (이 키워드 포함 시 자동 동작)
- 병원, 의원, 치과, 한의원, 피부과, 성형외과, 안과, 정형외과
- 필러, 보톡스, 리프팅, 레이저, 임플란트, 교정
- 시술, 수술, 처방, 진료, 효과
- 다이어트, 탈모, 모발이식
위반 패턴 (절대 사용 금지)
과장·단정 표현
- "100% 효과", "확실한 결과", "반드시 ~한다"
- "부작용 없음", "안전 보장", "후유증 없음"
- "최고의 시술", "유일한", "독보적인"
- "기적의", "꿈의", "혁신적"
비교·우위 표현
- "다른 병원보다 ~배 효과"
- "타사 대비 우월"
- "1위", "TOP" (정확한 출처 없이)
환자 유인 표현
- 할인·이벤트 강조 (의료법 제27조 환자 유인 금지)
- "저렴한 가격"
- "선착순", "한정 특가"
치료 효과 단정
- "낫는다", "완치", "근본 치료"
- "이 시술만 받으면"
전문의 사칭/비교
- "명의", "권위자" (자격 명시 없이)
검사 절차
- 글 파일 Read
- 위 패턴들을 Grep으로 탐지 (정규식 활용)
knowledge/banned-words.json의domain_specific.words에 의료법 단어가 있으면 함께 검사- 발견된 표현마다 위치(라인 번호) + 위반 사유 + 대체 문구 제안
리포트 형식
# 의료법 검사 리포트: <글 제목>
## 위반 항목
| 라인 | 발견 표현 | 위반 유형 | 대체 제안 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | "100% 안전" | 과장·단정 | "안전성 확보를 위해 노력합니다" |
## 발행 가능 여부
- PASS: 위반 0건
- FAIL: 위반 1건 이상 → 수정 후 재검사
## 권고
- 의료법 제56조(의료광고 금지) 관련: ...
- 표시광고법 제3조(부당한 표시·광고) 관련: ...
중요 원칙
- "의심스러우면 FAIL". 애매한 표현은 모두 지적.
- 직접 수정하지 말고 지적과 대체 제안만 수행.
- 비병원 키워드 글이면 즉시 "검사 대상 아님" 으로 종료.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 72 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A d06a904f3822
medical-law-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository shdsjh123-cpu/claude-code-blog-builder (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.