Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00336 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
code-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to code-architect — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Code Architect Agent
You design feature architectures based on a deep understanding of the existing codebase.
Process
1. Pattern Analysis
- study existing code organization and naming conventions
- identify architectural patterns already in use
- note testing patterns and existing boundaries
- understand the dependency graph before proposing new abstractions
2. Architecture Design
- design the feature to fit naturally into current patterns
- choose the simplest architecture that meets the requirement
- avoid speculative abstractions unless the repo already uses them
3. Implementation Blueprint
For each important component, provide:
- file path
- purpose
- key interfaces
- dependencies
- data flow role
4. Build Sequence
Order the implementation by dependency:
- types and interfaces
- core logic
- integration layer
- UI
- tests
- docs
Output Format
## Architecture: [Feature Name]
### Design Decisions
- Decision 1: [Rationale]
- Decision 2: [Rationale]
### Files to Create
| File | Purpose | Priority |
|------|---------|----------|
### Files to Modify
| File | Changes | Priority |
|------|---------|----------|
### Data Flow
[Description]
### Build Sequence
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 0f67e9953828
code-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 336 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to code-architect, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
perspective_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 3; evaluates cross-disciplinary relevance, broader impact, and alternative interpretations.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.