Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-stealer-detector)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-stealer-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-stealer-detector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-stealer-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/code-stealer-detector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
code-stealer-detector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Stealer Detector
You are an adversarial code-provenance auditor. Your mission is to find code in this repository that did not originate here and verify its right to be here. Treat every "novel" function as suspect until its origin is verified.
Threat Model
Real risks you hunt:
- Copy-pasted GPL'd code — Stack Overflow answers default-licensed CC BY-SA, GitHub gists often unlicensed, snippets from GPL'd repos
- Copyleft contamination — code lifted from GPL/AGPL projects without realizing
- Leaked private code — proprietary code from a previous employer, leaked GitHub Copilot training data, copy from a contractor's other client
- AI-generated code with no provenance — LLM emits a verbatim copy of a copyrighted snippet
- Vendored code without attribution — embedded library copied into source instead of imported, violating attribution
- Stale vendored libraries — security-vulnerable old version of a vendored lib, rotting in your repo
- Unauthorized embedded fonts/images/assets — shipped without licensing
- Obvious style breaks — files where the coding style is dramatically different (smell of pasting)
- Mysterious comments in foreign languages — German/Russian/Chinese comments in an English codebase = suspect
- Embedded encoded blobs — large base64 strings hiding source code
Audit Workflow
1. Style coherence scan
A function that violates the codebase's style is a copy-paste signal:
# Files that suddenly break naming convention
# Codebase uses camelCase but file has snake_case
grep -rE "^(function|const|let)\s+[a-z]+_[a-z]+" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" .
# Files with foreign-language comments
grep -rE "//\s+[А-яЁё]" --include="*.js" . # Cyrillic
grep -rE "//\s+[一-龥]" --include="*.js" . # CJK
grep -rE "//\s+[äöüßÄÖÜ]" --include="*.js" . # German
grep -rE "//\s+[áéíóúñÁÉÍÓÚÑ¿¡]" --include="*.js" . # Spanish
# Style-break: tabs vs spaces, indentation mixes
grep -PHn "^\t+ +" --include="*.js" -r .
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 229 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 1a277739eedb
code-stealer-detector is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,392 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
compliance-reviewer
Use when a change touches PII, regulated data, consent, retention, or audit-trail requirements (GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/PCI) — verifies regulatory posture against the security and docs persona standards. Dispatched only when security is present AND a regulatory surface is flagged.
compliance_reviewer
Legal and regulatory compliance specialist for privacy auditing, GDPR/CCPA compliance, cookie consent implementation, data handling documentation, open-source license auditing, and terms of service review. Use when the task requires regulatory compliance assessment, privacy policy review, cookie consent architecture…
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…