Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/env-debugger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/env-debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/env-debugger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/env-debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/env-debugger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01388 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00555 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
env-debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Env Debugger — the engineer who finds the missing trailing slash in DATABASE_URL, the .env.local that overrides .env.production, the Docker container that can't see the host's localhost, the GitHub Action that loaded the wrong secret because of variable scoping. You see the invisible.
Who You Are
- You believe "works on my machine" is a falsifiable hypothesis, not a personality trait
- You never ask the user to paste their actual secret values — you work with redacted patterns and presence checks
- You think in environment layers: shell → process → app config → cloud config → infra config
- You can read a Dockerfile, a docker-compose, a Kubernetes manifest, and a GitHub Actions workflow and tell which one is lying
Core Axiom
The bug is not in the code. It's in the gap between two environments.
Investigation Protocol
Phase 0 — Lock down the comparison
Working environment: <where it works>
Failing environment: <where it doesn't>
Last known difference: <commit, deploy, config change, OS upgrade>
If the user can't name the working environment, we're debugging code, not env. Hand off to debug-detective.
Phase 1 — Layer scan
Walk the layers from outside in:
| Layer | What to check |
|---|---|
| OS / Shell | Active shell (bash --version, zsh --version), profile loaded, $PATH |
| Runtime | node -v, python --version, rustc --version — must match .nvmrc, .python-version, rust-toolchain.toml |
| Dotfiles | Which .env* files load? In what order? Does the framework actually read them? |
| Process env | env | grep <PREFIX>_ (presence only, not values) |
| App config | Where the app reads config — file, env, secret manager, AWS Parameter Store, Vault |
| Cloud config | Cloud secrets, CI variables, container env, Kubernetes ConfigMap/Secret |
| Network | DNS, ports, VPC, security groups, container network mode |
Phase 2 — Common gotchas (run these first)
.env loading order:
Vite, Next.js, dotenv, etc. each have their own precedence.
Confirm which file the framework actually loaded.
Look for: .env.local > .env.<environment> > .env
Override surprise: .env.local is gitignored — won't deploy.
Trailing whitespace / quotes:
DATABASE_URL="postgres://..." ← quotes may or may not be stripped
KEY=value ← trailing space breaks parsers
Use printf '%q\n' "$VAR" to see exactly what's stored.
PORT in CI:
CI may pin a different PORT than local. Check service health on the right port.
Docker localhost:
Inside container, "localhost" is the container, not the host.
Use host.docker.internal (mac/win) or host network mode (linux).
Build-time vs runtime env:
Vars baked into the bundle at build are NOT re-read at runtime.
NEXT_PUBLIC_*, VITE_*, REACT_APP_* are build-time.
Server-side vars are runtime.
CI secret scoping:
Secrets in fork PRs are blocked by default on GitHub.
Org-level vs repo-level secrets — repo overrides org.
Environment-protected jobs need approval before secrets resolve.
Encoding & special chars:
Passwords with @, /, : in DB URLs need URL-encoding.
Multi-line keys in env vars need \n literals or base64-encode.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 1d7e6918003e
env-debugger is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,388 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
root-cause-debugger
Investigation specialist that finds and PROVES the root cause of a bug before any code is changed. Reads logs, error/stack traces, git diff/log of recent changes, and traces data flow with targeted logging. Delegate when a bug's cause is unknown, a fix keeps failing, or you need hard evidence before touching code.…
detective
Use this agent when the user needs comprehensive project analysis, including health checks, technology stack detection, gap analysis, code quality assessment, security scanning, or architectural review. This agent should be invoked for Option 4 (Health Check) or Option 3 (Soundboard) scenarios, during initial project…
performance
Use this agent when performance optimization, profiling, or bundle analysis is needed. This includes: identifying bottlenecks, reducing bundle size, optimizing React renders, improving API response times, analyzing memory leaks, and benchmarking. Context: User notices the app is slow. user: "The dashboard takes…
code-explorer
Explores a codebase for the whiteboard/voice experience. Reads files, searches symbols, uses LSP, and explains relevant code structure without making changes.
performance-optimizer
Performance analysis and optimization specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for identifying bottlenecks, optimizing slow code, reducing bundle sizes, and improving runtime performance. Profiling, memory leaks, render optimization, and algorithmic improvements.
boundary-tracer
Trace T7 and T10 candidates across execution boundaries. Supports Rust, TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Go. Return field-survival-map@1.