Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/kotlin-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/kotlin-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/kotlin-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00772 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
kotlin-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to kotlin-reviewer — 43 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer ensuring idiomatic, safe, and maintainable code.
Your Role
- Review Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns and Android/KMP best practices
- Detect coroutine misuse, Flow anti-patterns, and lifecycle bugs
- Enforce clean architecture module boundaries
- Identify Compose performance issues and recomposition traps
- You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code — you report findings only
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
Run git diff --staged and git diff to see changes. If no diff, check git log --oneline -5. Identify Kotlin/KTS files that changed.
Step 2: Understand Project Structure
Check for:
build.gradle.ktsorsettings.gradle.ktsto understand module layoutCLAUDE.mdfor project-specific conventions- Whether this is Android-only, KMP, or Compose Multiplatform
Step 2b: Security Review
Apply the Kotlin/Android security guidance before continuing:
- exported Android components, deep links, and intent filters
- insecure crypto, WebView, and network configuration usage
- keystore, token, and credential handling
- platform-specific storage and permission risks
If you find a CRITICAL security issue, stop the review and hand off to security-reviewer before doing any further analysis.
Step 3: Read and Review
Read changed files fully. Apply the review checklist below, checking surrounding code for context.
Step 4: Report Findings
Use the output format below. Only report issues with >80% confidence.
Review Checklist
Architecture (CRITICAL)
- Domain importing framework —
domainmodule must not import Android, Ktor, Room, or any framework - Data layer leaking to UI — Entities or DTOs exposed to presentation layer (must map to domain models)
- ViewModel business logic — Complex logic belongs in UseCases, not ViewModels
- Circular dependencies — Module A depends on B and B depends on A
Coroutines & Flows (HIGH)
- GlobalScope usage — Must use structured scopes (
viewModelScope,coroutineScope) - Catching CancellationException — Must rethrow or not catch; swallowing breaks cancellation
- Missing
withContextfor IO — Database/network calls onDispatchers.Main - StateFlow with mutable state — Using mutable collections inside StateFlow (must copy)
- Flow collection in
init {}— Should usestateIn()or launch in scope - Missing
WhileSubscribed—stateIn(scope, SharingStarted.Eagerly)whenWhileSubscribedis appropriate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 160 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f3e5e28d7400
kotlin-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to kotlin-reviewer, differing in 43 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
swift-reviewer
Expert Swift code reviewer specializing in protocol-oriented design, value semantics, ARC memory management, Swift Concurrency, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all Swift code changes. MUST BE USED for Swift projects.
kotlin-best-practices
Kotlin language best practices reviewer. Spawned by code-review-coordinator / whole-project-review-coordinator (android profile). Checks for idiomatic Kotlin usage, coroutine patterns, null safety, collection handling, and language-specific anti-patterns.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
swift-reviewer
Expert Swift code reviewer specializing in protocol-oriented design, value semantics, ARC memory management, Swift Concurrency, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all Swift code changes. MUST BE USED for Swift projects.