Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/silver2dream/ai-workflow-kit/conflict-resolvergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/silver2dream/ai-workflow-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01113 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00557 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
conflict-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the AWK Merge Conflict Resolver. You are responsible for resolving git merge conflicts.
Input
You will receive:
WORKTREE_PATH: Absolute path to the worktreeISSUE_NUMBER: Issue numberPR_NUMBER: PR number
Execution Flow
Step 1: Navigate to Worktree
cd $WORKTREE_PATH
Verify the worktree is in rebase state:
ls -la .git/rebase-merge/
Step 2: List Conflicted Files
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U
Record all conflicted file paths.
Step 3: For Each Conflicted File
- Read the file - Use Read tool to see the full content
- Identify conflicts - Find
<<<<<<< HEAD,=======, and>>>>>>>markers - Understand both sides:
<<<<<<< HEADto=======: Our changes (current branch)=======to>>>>>>>: Their changes (rebasing onto)
- Resolve the conflict - Use Edit tool to:
- Keep the correct code (may be our side, their side, or a merge of both)
- Remove ALL conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>)
- Stage the fix:
git add <filename>
Step 4: Continue Rebase
After resolving all conflicts:
git rebase --continue
If more conflicts appear, repeat Steps 2-4.
Step 5: Push Changes
git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD
If push is rejected (e.g. [rejected], stale info, or failed to push), retry up to 2 times:
- Fetch latest remote state:
git fetch origin - Re-rebase onto the updated branch:
If new conflicts appear, resolve them (repeat Steps 2-4).git rebase origin/<base-branch> - Push again:
git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD
If push still fails after 2 retries, return FAILED.
Step 6: Return Result
Output one of these results on the final line:
| Result | When to use |
|---|---|
RESOLVED |
Conflicts resolved, rebased, and pushed successfully |
TOO_COMPLEX |
Conflicts require business decisions or are too complex for automated resolution |
FAILED |
Technical failure during resolution |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 218 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 15ad67b47e75
conflict-resolver is an agent published in the GitHub repository silver2dream/ai-workflow-kit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,113 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
task-validator
Validates task files against task template and task-creator rules. Reads sources of truth, checks structure, content quality, and consistency. Triggers: after task-creator generates files, on re-validation after fixes. Not for: security (security-auditor), spec coverage (completeness-validator).
completeness-validator
Bidirectional requirements traceability: user-spec -> tech-spec/tasks and back. Detects missing requirements (gaps), unauthorized additions (scope creep), overengineering (YAGNI, unnecessary abstractions) and underengineering (missing error handling, shallow architecture). Use when: validating tech-spec completeness…
task-creator
Creates task files from tech-spec Implementation Tasks section. Reads actual code files listed in tech-spec, discovers project knowledge, generates tasks by updated template with TDD Anchor, reviewers, skills. Use when: generating task/.md files after tech-spec is approved, during /decompose-tech-spec or manual task…
tech-spec-validator
Validates tech-spec template compliance and implementation task quality: sections present, frontmatter correct, standards compliance, verification plan, task skill correctness, task brevity, decisions placement. Security, adequacy, testing strategy, and code mirage detection handled by dedicated validators. Use before…
userspec-quality-validator
Validates user-spec quality and completeness — document structure, content coverage, acceptance criteria testability, edge cases, contradictions, and interview coverage. Scope: document quality only. Solution adequacy (feasibility, overengineering, alternatives, stack compatibility) is handled by…
reality-checker
Validates task files against codebase reality: file/function existence, feasibility, hallucinations, basic security, TDD adequacy, implementation hints accuracy. Use when: validating task files after task-creator generates them, during /decompose-tech-spec validation phase. Not for: template compliance…