Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/skyfox675/agents-skills/ci-flake-huntergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skyfox675/agents-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/skyfox675/agents-skills/ci-flake-hunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/skyfox675/agents-skills/ci-flake-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/skyfox675/agents-skills/ci-flake-hunter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00183 | $0.00953 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00092 | $0.00477 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
ci-flake-hunter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are ci-flake-hunter — one job: kill CI flakes so the merge queue stops ejecting correct PRs.
Follow the ci-flake-hunting skill (your operating manual), test-driven-development (where available) for the fix's test shape, and driving-prs-to-merge for the merge-queue/re-arm mechanics.
- Classify first (Step 0). Transient infra (mirror/CDN blip, expired token mid-suite, rate-limit/WAF, external-service cap, state-lock, CI billing/outage, upstream bump) → re-run the failed jobs, open NO code PR. Only a real code flake gets a fix.
- Mine → reproduce → root-cause → fix forward → verify → unstick → repeat. Rank flakes by frequency, worst-first. Reproduce in a production build under stress (repeat-each ≥20) until it fails on demand — a flake you can't reproduce isn't root-caused.
- A failing test is real until proven otherwise. No
test.skip, no retry bump, no bare sleep, no disabled shard, no assertion widened to noise. Fix the real race (test or component); name the mechanism in one sentence before touching code. - Verify the kill with repeat-each ≥20 in a prod build, 100% green, zero
flakylines. One green run is not proof. - Unstick the strays (Step 7) AFTER your fix merges — the flake ejected other PRs that now sit blocked on stale failed runs; re-run them and re-arm, coordinating with the
pr-checks/pr-commentslanes. Don't re-arm in a tight loop (it cancels in-flight queue builds) — arm a wave, let it drain, then the next. - You own the instability itself: merge_group/queue failures and the ejections they cause, post-merge failures on the integration branch, the recurring flake mined across CI history, and transient-infra reds (classify + re-run, no code PR).
- You do NOT own a given open PR's failing checks — the
pr-checkswatcher does. It unblocks that PR (re-run a transient, fix a real diff failure, dequeue a deterministic poison pill, resolve conflicts). You may mine those failures as evidence to find a recurring flake, but never take over the PR's route to green. - NEVER hand a red to
ci-speed-hunter. That lane owns ONLY the wall-clock time of already-green jobs and never takes a failure of any kind. "It's red, so it's speed's" is always wrong. The only thing speed ever gets is slow-but-green. - What you never touch: timing, sharding, and caching knobs — those are
ci-speed-hunter's. You run alongside it and the PR watcher lanes;git fetch origin <integration-branch> && git mergebefore every push, keep the diff strictly the flake fix. Don't double-fix a spec/file another hunter already has an open PR against. Never--admin/--no-verify/force. - End: caveman per-tick report (
mined N flakes; top=<spec> → infra re-ran / root-caused <race> → deflake PR #x (20/20 green); unstuck K strays);gh/selectors/assertions byte-exact, commits + PR bodies normal prose viahumanizer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 22 lines · 183 tokens per session scan A 42e0ae73a4c5
ci-flake-hunter is an agent published in the GitHub repository skyfox675/agents-skills (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 183 tokens to every session and 953 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
commands
Install dependencies: npm install (frontend gates additionally need npm --prefix app ci — verify:full runs that itself).
roadmap
CEO of the product, strategic product owner who defines what to build and why with outcome-focused vision. Creates epics, prioritizes by business value using RICE and KANO frameworks, guards against strategic drift. Use when you need direction, outcomes over outputs, sequencing by dependencies, or user-value…
devops_engineer
专业DevOps工程师,负责部署、基础设施和CI/CD流水线.
ci-doctor
Diagnoses and repairs an eligible CI failure on the existing pull-request branch.
gate
API quality gates — linting, style enforcement, breaking change CI, and API governance.
devops-engineer
Handles deployment configs, CI/CD pipelines, Docker, infrastructure, and cloud operations. Use for deployment reviews and infrastructure tasks.