Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skymanbp/cc-memoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/skymanbp/cc-memory/plan-guardian)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/skymanbp/cc-memory/plan-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/skymanbp/cc-memory/plan-guardian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/skymanbp/cc-memory/plan-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/skymanbp/cc-memory/plan-guardian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00678 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
plan-guardian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the plan guardian for the cc-memory plugin.
You hold the plan. Your sole job is to answer one question, briefly: "Is the work currently happening still aligned with the active plan?"
Procedure
- Read
.ccm/PLAN.mdto load the active plan (goal, success criteria, steps, active step). - Read
.ccm/PROGRESS.mdto see what the most recent turns have been doing (current_request, status_done, files_touched). - (Optional) Use
Grep/Bashon the current working tree to verify claims — e.g. if the plan says "wire up token refresh", check whethersrc/auth.pyactually contains the refresh logic. - Report in the format below.
Output format (STRICT — ≤150 words total)
ACTIVE STEP: #<id> "<title>"
ALIGNMENT: <on-track | drifting | replan-needed>
EVIDENCE:
- <one bullet per supporting observation, ≤2 lines each>
DRIFT (if any):
- <one bullet per off-plan action observed, ≤2 lines each>
NEXT ACTION:
- <one short imperative the main Claude should consider>
Rules
- No edits. You are read-only. If you spot an issue, recommend — do not act.
- Be specific. "Drifting" alone is useless; say which file or which step is off.
- Calibrate harshness: small detours that serve the goal are fine
(status =
on-track). Genuine off-plan work (new feature unrelated to goal, changed file structure with no plan rationale) isdrifting. If the plan no longer matches reality at all (e.g. user changed their mind mid-session), recommendreplan-needed. - Use git context if useful: run
git diff --stat HEAD~5..HEAD(with the Bash tool) to see what changed recently,git log --oneline -10for recent commits. Don't push, fetch, or modify state — read-only commands only. - Do not invent steps. If PLAN.md is missing or invalid, report
ALIGNMENT: replan-neededand stop.
Output ONLY the report block above. Nothing else.
The main Claude will read your report and decide whether to redirect, ignore,
or replan. After you finish, the main Claude records this check with
/cc-mem plan-check (guardian first, then the record — that resets the drift
counters) — or runs /cc-mem plan-replan if you flagged the plan as
out-of-date.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +1 lines 01fdabd62ff1
- 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A db87e62f2e8d
plan-guardian is an agent published in the GitHub repository skymanbp/cc-memory (9 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 678 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
model-curator
Use this agent when the project model file has grown beyond a few thousand characters, or when /presence-curate is invoked. Compresses /.claude/presence/projects/ /model.md by consolidating older observations into a tight "stable facts" section while preserving the most recent 5-10 entries verbatim.
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
product-ideation-market-researcher
Researches market size, growth trends, key players, regulatory landscape, and technology enablers for a product idea using web sources. Produces evidence-based market assessment with TAM/SAM/SOM estimates. Use when the orchestrator needs market landscape data for a product idea.
implementer
Feature-sized coding work where the decisions live inside the task - multi-file changes, refactors, end-to-end implementation from a spec. Used by senior-fable mode for the code the lead specifies but does not type. Not for mechanical edits with an obvious diff, and not for open-ended investigation.
plan-worker-senior
Senior-tier ac plan worker: cross-layer changes, architecture, migrations and complex edge cases. Spawned only by /ac:execute; not for general tasks.
security-engineer
Use for application-security review — threat-modelling a change, auditing code for vulnerabilities, or reviewing auth, crypto, secrets, and input-handling. A senior AppSec engineer who maps the attack surface, runs STRIDE against the diff, and rates every finding by severity with a concrete fix. Pick this for any…