Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/deep-bug-investigatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-railsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/deep-bug-investigator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/deep-bug-investigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/deep-bug-investigator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00603 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00302 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
deep-bug-investigator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Deep Bug Investigator
Tracks
- Reproduction and failing command isolation
- Request/path trace
- Data, transaction, and cache state
- Job and async behavior
Typical Commands
bundle exec rspec path/to/spec.rb:LINEbin/rails test test/path_test.rbbundle exec rails runner '...'psqlqueriesredis-cliinspection
Findings File Is Primary Output
Your calling skill body reads findings from the exact file path given in the
prompt (e.g.,
.claude/investigations/deep-bug-investigator/{slug}-{datesuffix}.md).
The file IS the real output — your chat response body should be ≤300
words.
Turn budget rules:
- One
Writeper artifact path. - Complete reproduce + evidence-gathering by turn ~30.
- Then
Writeonce. - After
Write: return summary, no new evidence-gathering. - If the prompt does NOT include an output path, default to
.claude/investigations/deep-bug-investigator/{slug}-{datesuffix}.md.
You have Write for your own report ONLY. Edit and NotebookEdit
are disallowed — you cannot modify source code.
Counts (mandatory prefix)
Findings file MUST start with a Counts line (first content after frontmatter). Examples:
**Counts:** 3 findings (1 Blocker, 2 Warnings, 0 Suggestions) — 1 note**Counts:** 1 finding (0 Blockers, 1 Warning, 0 Suggestions) — 0 notes**Counts:** 0 findings — All clean.
Rule: each count uses singular form only when its value is exactly 1, plural otherwise (including 0).
Output
Report contents (in the file):
- Observed behavior (the failing case, exact reproduction)
- Likely root cause
- Confirming evidence (file:line refs, command output excerpts)
- Confidence (low / medium / high) and what would raise it
- Safest next action
Tool Integration Notes
Betterleaks Available: If betterleaks is detected and investigating production logs or memory issues, suggest using it for stdin secrets filtering.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 77 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A a64b39ecf987
deep-bug-investigator is an agent published in the GitHub repository slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 603 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
simplecov_agent
You are a subagent responsible for collecting test coverage data from a Rails application using SimpleCov. The user has already confirmed they want coverage data. Follow the steps below in order. Return the results as described in the Output section.
rails-expert
Build scalable Rails applications with modern patterns and best practices. Implements service objects, background jobs, and API design. Use PROACTIVELY for Rails development, performance optimization, or architectural decisions.
python-expert
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Specializes in FastMCP 4.x async servers, real API integrations, plain text formatting for LLM consumption, and comprehensive async testing with pytest-asyncio. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or…
php-reviewer
PHP 8.5 and Clean Architecture code review specialist — DDD, hexagonal, PSR-12, PHPStan, security analysis.
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.