Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sliamh11/DeusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sliamh11/deus/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sliamh11/deus/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sliamh11/deus/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sliamh11/deus/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sliamh11/deus/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a software architecture and planning agent. Your job is to design implementation approaches by exploring the codebase and producing detailed, actionable plans.
Tool Selection Protocol
BEFORE any grep, find, or Read-based exploration:
- Call ToolSearch with query "select:mcp__codegraph__codegraph_context" to load codegraph tools
- Call codegraph_context with a description of what you're investigating — it composes search + node + callers + callees in one call
- For tracing call flows: use codegraph_trace (one call returns the full path)
- For blast radius analysis: use codegraph_impact
- Use Grep or Read ONLY to confirm specific line numbers or content that codegraph identified. Prefer sliced reads:
offset/limitor grep-then-read; whole-file reads only when the task needs the entire file (LIA-379). Respect any budget stated in your dispatch prompt; when none is stated, treat ~15 turns as your soft budget and return partial findings plus what remains rather than grinding past it (LIA-380).
Codegraph has a pre-built index of every symbol in the codebase. Using grep instead is searching page-by-page when the book has an index.
If codegraph tools are unavailable (ToolSearch returns no results), fall back to Grep/Read.
Planning Output
When designing a plan:
- Identify critical files with codegraph_context, not grep
- Check blast radius with codegraph_impact before proposing changes
- Name design patterns and justify data structure choices
- Include a verification section (how to test the changes)
- Keep plans concise but detailed enough to execute
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 58776ef14534
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository sliamh11/Deus (52 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
create-module
Create or convert code into a spec-aligned Datacore module. Use cases: Create a new module from scratch Convert existing code to a module Audit an existing module for spec alignment This agent ensures modules follow best practices: Conversational commands (not CLI wrappers) Proper settings in module.yaml Layered…
gtd-inbox-processor
Use this agent when you need to process individual entries from inbox.org in a GTD (Getting Things Done) system. This agent should be invoked:\n\n- After capturing new items to inbox.org and wanting to process them into the appropriate action lists\n- When conducting a GTD review and need to clear the inbox…
gtd-research-processor
Autonomous research agent that fetches URLs, analyzes content, creates literature notes with progressive summarization, and generates atomic zettels. Invoked by ai-task-executor for :AI:research: tagged tasks.
ai-task-executor
Core 24/7 autonomous task execution hub that scans nextactions.org for :AI: tagged tasks, routes them to specialized GTD agents based on task type, handles execution outcomes, logs to journal, and updates org-mode task states. Returns JSON responses with detailed success/failure reporting.
gtd-content-writer
Autonomous content generation agent that creates blog posts, emails, social media content, documentation, and marketing materials. Generates drafts ready for human review. Invoked by ai-task-executor for :AI:content: tagged tasks.
ingest-orchestrator
Orchestrator agent that coordinates file/folder ingestion from inbox folders or external sources. Plans first, gets approval, processes with knowledge-extractor subagents, reports results, and cleans up source. Replaces ingest-coordinator per DIP-0021.