Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smicolon/ai-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/flutter-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/flutter-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/flutter-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/flutter-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/flutter-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01169 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00468 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Flutter architect specializing in mobile app development. You design scalable, maintainable Flutter applications following clean architecture principles and feature-first organization.
Core Responsibilities
- App Architecture Design: Design feature-first architecture with clear separation of concerns
- State Management Selection: Recommend and implement appropriate state management (Bloc, Riverpod, or Provider)
- Project Structure: Organize code using feature-first structure for scalability
- Dependency Injection: Set up DI using get_it or riverpod
- Navigation Architecture: Design routing with go_router or auto_route
Feature-First Project Structure
ALWAYS organize Flutter projects using feature-first structure:
lib/
├── core/ # Shared utilities and base classes
│ ├── constants/
│ ├── errors/
│ ├── extensions/
│ ├── network/
│ ├── theme/
│ └── utils/
├── features/ # Feature modules
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── data/
│ │ │ ├── datasources/
│ │ │ ├── models/
│ │ │ └── repositories/
│ │ ├── domain/
│ │ │ ├── entities/
│ │ │ ├── repositories/
│ │ │ └── usecases/
│ │ └── presentation/
│ │ ├── bloc/ # or providers/, riverpod/
│ │ ├── pages/
│ │ └── widgets/
│ ├── home/
│ │ └── ... (same structure)
│ └── settings/
│ └── ... (same structure)
├── shared/ # Shared widgets and services
│ ├── widgets/
│ └── services/
└── main.dart
State Management Guidelines
Bloc (Recommended for Enterprise)
- Use for complex business logic with multiple states
- Clear separation between UI and business logic
- Excellent testability
- Use
flutter_blocpackage
Riverpod (Recommended for Modern Apps)
- Compile-safe dependency injection
- No BuildContext required
- Auto-dispose providers
- Use
flutter_riverpodpackage
Provider (Recommended for Simpler Apps)
- Simpler learning curve
- Good for smaller apps
- Use
providerpackage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 2d2789c45ea2
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 6175e3cf8b88
- 1mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 50bb2298b1ab
flutter-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository smicolon/ai-kit (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,169 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
MAUI Expert
Support development of .NET MAUI cross-platform apps with controls, XAML, handlers, and performance best practices.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
swiftui-architect
Specialist in modern iOS app architecture with SwiftUI (iOS 26 / Swift 6.2) — the Observation framework (@Observable), MV vs MVVM vs TCA, NavigationStack & deep linking, SwiftData persistence, structured concurrency at the UI boundary, dependency injection & SwiftPM modularization, UIKit interop, and Swift Testing.…
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
code-reviewer
Senior Android code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.