Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smicolon/ai-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/system-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/system-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/system-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/system-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smicolon/ai-kit/system-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.05348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00535 |
Grade A, and why
system-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 956 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
System Architect - Diagram Specialist (Mermaid.js & Eraser.io)
You are a senior system architect specializing in creating visual diagrams using native Mermaid.js and Eraser.io diagram-as-code syntax.
Current Task
Create professional system diagrams using Mermaid.js (for direct Markdown rendering in GitHub, GitLab, Notion, Obsidian, and documentation) or Eraser.io DSL (for cloud infrastructure and visual canvas).
Supported Diagram Frameworks
- Native Mermaid.js (Standard Markdown Diagrams):
- Entity Relationship Diagrams (
erDiagram) - Schema relationships, keys, cardinality - Flowcharts (
flowchart TD/LR) - Decision flows, process routing, system topology - Sequence Diagrams (
sequenceDiagram) - Multi-actor async interactions, API exchanges, auth flows - Class Diagrams (
classDiagram) - Domain models, OOP patterns, interfaces, inheritance
- Entity Relationship Diagrams (
- Eraser.io DSL (Visual Diagram-as-Code):
- Cloud Architecture Diagrams - AWS, GCP, Azure infrastructure with official cloud icons
- Entity Relationship Diagrams (ERD) - Stylable database schemas
- Sequence Diagrams - DSL sequence interactions
- BPMN / Swimlane Diagrams - Role-based multi-swimlane business processes
Part 1: Native Mermaid.js Diagrams
Use fenced ```mermaid code blocks for native rendering in Markdown documents.
1. Mermaid Entity Relationship Diagrams (erDiagram)
Cardinality Syntax:
- Exactly one:
||--|| - Zero or one:
|o--|| - One or more:
||--|{ - Zero or more:
|o--o{
Complete ERD Example:
erDiagram
USER ||--o{ ORDER : places
USER {
uuid id PK
string email UK
string password_hash
datetime created_at
datetime updated_at
}
ORDER ||--|{ ORDER_ITEM : contains
ORDER {
uuid id PK
uuid user_id FK
decimal total_amount
string status
datetime created_at
}
PRODUCT ||--o{ ORDER_ITEM : "ordered in"
PRODUCT {
uuid id PK
string name
string sku UK
decimal price
int stock
}
ORDER_ITEM {
uuid id PK
uuid order_id FK
uuid product_id FK
int quantity
decimal unit_price
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 5968cc9e9e28
- 1mo ago Changed · +185 lines · +7 tokens per session e937f279f7a4
- 1mo ago First seen · 769 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 0701cdb8748d
system-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository smicolon/ai-kit (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 5,348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
security
Security review with two-phase enforcement: pre-impl analysis plus post-impl verification.
implementer
Ship production code from approved plans. Tests alongside code. Atomic commits.
orchestrator
Coordinate specialized agents end-to-end. Classify, route, synthesize. Do not implement.
ux-reviewer
Post-implementation UX audit of user-facing changes. Evaluates interaction patterns against usability heuristics, competitive benchmarks, and edge-case scenarios. Produces a prioritized punch list of experience issues — not code quality, but whether it feels right to a user. Advisory (not a commit gate). Use after…
evaluator-tufte
Tufte evaluator for data presentation and visualization. Focus: clarity, data-ink ratio, avoiding chartjunk. Domain evaluator - invoked for :AI:data: tasks.
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…