optimizely-experimentation

optimizely-experimentation is an agent for Claude Code from smithdak/claude-marketplace. It costs 18 tokens per session (1,594 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent for checking how the Optimizely Experimentation SDK is connected to a CMS project. Optimizely Experimentation is a service for running experiments and controlling feature flags.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect SDK setup and feature-flag patterns in Optimizely CMS projects.
Why use it?
It helps reveal SDK code that is referenced but not configured, along with error-prone string-based feature-flag access.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the optimizely plugin — 5 skills, 4 commands, 10 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect SDK setup and feature-flag patterns in Optimizely CMS projects.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/smithdak/claude-marketplace/experimentation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smithdak/claude-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install optimizely, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 4 commands, 10 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for optimizely-experimentation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smithdak/claude-marketplace/experimentation.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/smithdak/claude-marketplace/experimentation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/smithdak/claude-marketplace/experimentation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/smithdak/claude-marketplace/experimentation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,594 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.01594
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00797
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00319
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00159

Measured 6d ago against content hash b4fb06967a2c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

optimizely-experimentation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/optimizely-cms-analyzer/agents/experimentation.md · 285 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Optimizely Experimentation Agent

Analyze Optimizely Experimentation SDK integration within CMS projects.

Analysis Areas

1. SDK Initialization

EXP-001: Experimentation SDK Without Initialization (Warning)

Check for proper SDK setup:

Grep: Optimizely\.Experimentation
Grep: AddOptimizelyExperimentation
Grep: OptimizelyClient
Grep: IOptimizely

Bad Pattern (SDK referenced but not initialized):

// Package added but not configured
public class MyService
{
    private readonly IOptimizely _optimizely;
    // But no initialization in Startup...
}

Good Pattern:

// In Startup.cs or Program.cs
services.AddOptimizelyExperimentation(options =>
{
    options.SdkKey = Configuration["Optimizely:SdkKey"];
});

2. Feature Flag Patterns

EXP-002: Feature Flags Not Using Typed Accessors (Warning)

Feature flags should use typed accessors:

Grep: IsFeatureEnabled\s*\(\s*["']
Grep: GetFeatureVariable\s*\(

Bad Pattern (String-based):

// Magic strings - error prone
var isEnabled = _optimizely.IsFeatureEnabled("new_checkout", userId);
var discount = _optimizely.GetFeatureVariableDouble("pricing", "discount", userId);

Good Pattern (Typed accessors):

// Typed feature keys
public static class FeatureKeys
{
    public const string NewCheckout = "new_checkout";
    public const string Pricing = "pricing";
}

public static class FeatureVariables
{
    public const string Discount = "discount";
}

var isEnabled = _optimizely.IsFeatureEnabled(FeatureKeys.NewCheckout, userId);
var discount = _optimizely.GetFeatureVariableDouble(
    FeatureKeys.Pricing,
    FeatureVariables.Discount,
    userId);

3. Event Tracking Configuration

EXP-003: Experimentation Tracking Not Configured (Info)

Check for event tracking setup:

Grep: Track\s*\(
Grep: IEventDispatcher
Grep: EventDispatcher

Good Pattern:

// Track conversion events
_optimizely.Track("purchase_completed", userId, new UserAttributes
{
    { "device", "mobile" },
    { "customer_type", "returning" }
});

Read the full file on GitHub · 285 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 285 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A b4fb06967a2c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

optimizely-experimentation is an agent published in the GitHub repository smithdak/claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,594 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens

dotnet-architecture-reviewer

Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…

StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit · 102 tokens